top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Arch is simple, but not easy.
Other distros might be easy, but not simple

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, have you seen archinstall? its pretty easy and straightforward. Unless you have a phobia against terminal screens.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    At this point it's easier / more comfortable than a windows install. No waiting between steps, no unnecessary options, easier disk layouts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    You'd like to think people just do this to assholes, but the number of innocent noobs that get recommended Arch is too damn high.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    EndeavourOS represent! πŸͺπŸš€ Much easier install plus some pretty sick wallpapers, all without being hostile to users like Windows is some proprietary operating systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    I had slight issues with cachy but once I manually partitioned with gparted it worked well, (did the exact steps it wouldve done automatically) Was still easy using a graphical interface and mouse for everything

    Might swap to endeavor tho seems more stable even tho ive had no issues past preinstall, just want to commit long term to linux and it seems easier to do with endeavor over cachy

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    everything is simple once you know how to do it. i think a lot of the arch recommenders likely don’t realize how difficult some of these things can be the first time. it’s the same with any kind of specialized knowledge i think. it’s one of the reasons why teaching can be difficult. but the arch community has been super helpful in my experience

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's a general problem with the community in my experience. People keep saying it's "simple", then whip 3 terminal commands out of their pocket nobody without extensive knowledge would understand (or be able to tell if they do something wrong). They just don't realize how much knowledge they possess in comparison, and/or how little others are interested in gaining said knowledge (not because they're ignorant, but simply because they got other priorities in life).

    The community really needs an "injection of normies" for some people to wake up from their elitism trip.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    People keep saying it's "simple", then whip 3 terminal commands out of their pocket nobody without extensive knowledge would understand

    People do the same thing for all Linux distributions though. You'll see people telling you to run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade like you'll see people telling you to run pacman -Syu.

    Not arguing that Arch is easy, just that this specifically doesn't feel like a counter argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Another thing that I hadn't really thought about before reading another comment in this thread is that the arch wiki install guide (and other pages) are written with the assumption that you want to understand what you're doing. And I think for many people that's just not the case. Which is fair enough, not everyone enjoys tinkering with software. Just like I'm currently paying someone to build my new pc for me because I really don't enjoy doing that. But there have been a few places within the arch install process where I had to research some background info to know what to optimally do for my use case instead of taking a guess and hoping it works out. And that's quite a barrier, I see people struggle with similar things all the time at work. If any research is required beyond what your step by step guide is telling them, many people will give up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 18 points 2 years ago

    Used Arch for a few years as well. Recommending it to newcomers who do not specifically ask for a learning experience is just vile.

    Specifying intent in the meme would've been too much text in my opinion though. In general I think unless specified one shouldn't expect newcomers to be into learning tech, but into ease of use.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I have a machine which has a much older installation. I've destroyed the pacman folder on the var partition accidentally which made my pacman stop working since it had no db and no idea of what packages were installed. I still managed to restore it with some weird scripts after that and is still working fine after like 2 years.

    Arch is freaking resilient, but mostly because I didn't want to reinstall since everything else is working xD

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    The worst part about "simple" is defining what that means for the person. Depending on what they mean, there are a lot of different answers.

    (And a good chunk of those are just Debian with different branding).

    As others have said, EndeavourOS is pretty damn easy too. Personally I'll stick to Arch for desktop, deb stable for servers/lxc's, and deb sid for mostly screwing around and sending some reports in so stable can be stable.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Why not just direct them to Gentoo?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    well it is simple, but you also gotta be competent as per the wiki :P

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It's fairly well documented and the up to date packages are very convenient.

    It can also be pretty confusing installing debian and having to find how to install packages that aren't out of date.

    Imo take a few hours to power through the wiki installation guide and it's really not too bad + you're equipped to fix issues as they arise. It's not Gentoo. When Ubuntu breaks for a new user, it's a nightmare too.

    So I think I disagree, it's been easier to use than Fedora, Mint, Debian, Ubuntu, Elementary in my experience. I use Gentoo too but that is indeed simple in the challenging sense.

    Arch is a nice middle ground between Ubuntu and Gentoo.

    Plus, with EndeavourOS users can have their cake and eat it too.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I mean, it is dead simple after all

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Manjaro was my "throwing into the water"-distro and it worked very well getting me swimming. YMMV.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Oh yeah, it's the community thinking about switching frustrated by the Linux culture that are unfriendly, not the Linux community itself being incredibly unwelcoming to anyone who doesn't "get it."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean as long as it's elementary OS that might be okay

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί