top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 3 years ago (2 children)

They say that like it's a bad thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Maybe capitalism needs to suck it up and pull itself up by its bootstraps instead of needing subsidized fossil fuels. /s

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    ↑ This, but without the /s.

    In particular, we need to protect the free market by creating a carbon tax to compensate for fossil fuels' negative externalities and level the playing field for "greener" competitors.

    Not taxing carbon is anti-capitalist protectionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    You don't need to end capitalism to help the climate.

    Just properly regulate it. It's a tool just like every other economic system, and shouldn't be hoisted to a higher pedestal. Every system that fails fails because regulation falls off the wayside and leads into corruption. Capitalism's only strength is it took longer to get there because all the power was spread out for awhile.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Is there a lemmy equivalent to /r/SelfAwareWolves? Because this fits.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago

    selfawarewolves material

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. It's just that capital would grow slower. You can have a green capitalism. It just that no one invested in that

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    "Think tank" as in circlejerk.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I miss r/PragerUrine. Par for the course for a right wing cesspool

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 17 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 16 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

    I've only recently come across PragerU on Youtube, and ever since I have only been rolling my eyes at what they say.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The mothers days day after I had a baby, they sent me a book in the mail about a boy and a dog (I think the dogs name was Otto) celebrating mothers. It was weird but historically accurate. They said that one of the founding fathers mother was a good mother because she taught the founding fathers the bible. Im not sure what to do with the book... Donate it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    I love animals. I hate mosquitoes. If one gets in my house I'll hunt it down and smash it gleefully. Then apologize and tell it I feel bad because it didn't choose to be born a mosquito

    Same for this book. I love books and feel they should be respected, but perhaps this one is like a mosquito and maybe should be disposed of into the recycling

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago*
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (18 children)

    Honest question, what economic or political system exists out there that would be better for climate change?

    Or is the assumption that system doesn’t exist yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (24 children)

    There are several ideas out there, but yes they generally require transitioning away from capitalism. The one I'm particularly fond of is called a "library economy", where we no longer commoditize anything that isn't consumable. Imagine instead of buying a wheelbarrow and shovel to do some yard work, you go to the gardening library and checkout the things you need. When you're done in about 3 weeks, you return the items back to the library.

    In general though, any planned economy would be far more efficient and less wasteful. Imagine that instead of 30 different TV's with the exact same panel, there's 2 or 3 types of tv with that panel. The way Walmart operates is a perfect example of a planned economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I don't see how a library economy would work with a lot of things. Like, if I wanted to do a house cleaning day, I go to the cleaning library and rent a vacuum. But what if I drop something on the floor...I have to check out a vacuum, just to clean it up? Then what if all the vacuums are checked out? It really seems horrible inefficient and a logistical nightmare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Any system that has some growth built into it will eventually cause problems, it's just that some of them, like capitalism, are very efficient at getting us to these points faster. The best system for the climate was discarded long ago, as we moved out of the hunter-gather phase and discovered techniques in maximizing our energy into other things besides just surviving. Agriculture and all that it allowed were the first steps into taxing the earth's balance.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    Best comedy website ever

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›