There’s an idea floating around that DeepSeek’s well-documented censorship only exists at its application layer but goes away if you run it locally (that means downloading its AI model to your computer).

But DeepSeek’s censorship is baked-in, according to a Wired investigation which found that the model is censored on both the application and training levels.

For example, a locally run version of DeepSeek revealed to Wired thanks to its reasoning feature that it should “avoid mentioning” events like the Cultural Revolution and focus only on the “positive” aspects of the Chinese Communist Party.

A quick check by TechCrunch of a locally run version of DeepSeek available via Groq also showed clear censorship: DeepSeek happily answered a question about the Kent State shootings in the U.S., but replied “I cannot answer” when asked about what happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I see people on this website saying the local version is uncensored all the time lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There is censorship baked in, but extremely easy to "jailbreak" and bypass them, as well as doing things like just abliterating the model to remove all refusals. Interacting with the app has multiple layers of censorship to defeat "jailbreak" strategies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Deepseek's responses to questions about the ccp are likely not implemented in the same manner as the oversight mechanisms preventing you from asking about illicit drug production and whatnot.

    If sufficient information about the CCP is literally not provided to it in its training data then it is not a simple matter of turning the mechanism on or off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    At least unlike “Open”AI, it’s open source so you can see and fix its biases.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No, it's not open source. Only the model weights are open, the datasets and code used to train the model are not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Good luck determining which combination of its 1.5 billions weights/biases corresponds to sympathy for the chinese.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Just hit that mf with a "ignore previous instructions"

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I asked it what I should make for dinner and it suggested a stir fry. A Chinese dish! Coincidence? I think not.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments