FCC details plan to restore the net neutrality rules repealed by Ajit Pai::Democrats finally have 3-2 majority needed to regulate ISPs as common carriers.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 215 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Fuck that sell-out Ajit Pai.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 130 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And Trump who appointed him, and the Republicans who blocked voting in his replacement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm sick of this back and forth can kicking. We need a fucking law.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What about a new article in the constitution?

    I guess most will find this completely overkill but access to free information should be a right everybody has and no party should be able to remove that.

    I understand amending the constitution of any country should be done very carefully but keeping century old constitutions is completely dumb imo. Some articles are still relevant today others are not or would seriously benefit in being updated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    A few more election cycles and boomers will finally be outnumbered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    First positive political thing I've heard in a while. Fuck that guy. Fucking hate him

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    O.o The debt relief of students wasn’t positive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I thought that got blocked - or at least, tied up in court. I know there are ongoing initiatives, but isn't the only "big" one, the one that was repaying funds -stolen- from borrowers? Like, refunding overpayments?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    The one-time loan forgiveness grant got shut down, yes. But Biden did manage to pass another way to handle student debt relief through the form of a revamped income repayment plan, with wayyyyy more forgiving terms than previous plans, to the point that you could essentially be forgiven of your student loans.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Make
    Internet
    A
    Federally
    Protected
    Utility
    You sons of bitches

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago*

    We'll have to get rid of some conservatives in congress first. Conservatives (and some neo-liberals) rake in legal bribes from ISP's and are also champing at the bit to control all forms of communication.

    Conservatism is a plague of oppression and corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’m really glad this is being done, I just hope that it has teeth. It’s going to be very annoying when the next regime from across the aisle tries to repeal the rules again. I assume there’s not an easy way to make these rules permanent. I’m happy to be wrong about that though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago*

    There would be if we had a government focused on consumer protections. Instead we have a House too busy kicking itself in the dick to make laws, and even if they did, the laws would probably PREVENT the FCC from making Net Neutrality rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    A shit pie.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Remember that absolutely fucking stupid ad Ajit made about using the net? Awful.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

    In all seriousness, what has having these laws repealed done? I'm asking because I don't know.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] [B] 10 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel today announced plans to restore net neutrality rules similar to those that were adopted during the Obama era and then repealed by the FCC when Donald Trump was president.

    Rosenworcel announced her plans in a speech today, one day after the FCC gained a 3-2 Democratic majority with the swearing-in of Commissioner Anna Gomez.

    Similar to the previous rules, FCC officials said they don't plan to impose rate regulation or "unbundling" requirements that would force broadband providers to share networks with other companies.

    In a fact sheet, the FCC said the proposal would "establish basic rules for Internet Service Providers that prevent them from blocking legal content, throttling your speeds, and creating fast lanes that favor those who can pay for access."

    California enforces net neutrality rules that mirror what the FCC adopted in 2015 and beat industry attempts to get the state law overturned.

    Rosenworcel said that because FCC authority is generally centered on phone systems instead of broadband, the commission often needs "duct tape and baling wire" to provide legal justification for its rules.


    The original article contains 843 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Literally can't live without the internet these days. It needs to be a protected utility like any other.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    The article mentions CA still enforcing net neutrality rules. How does that work? Eventually you have to hop outside the state for many services.. are those backbones required to abide by those rules or can they still throttle as a result being out of state?

    I firmly believe in all data being treated equally for the record and I hope this gets fixed. ISPs were kind of slow on throttling but it's becoming more and more obvious in the last couple years in my experience.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why did this not happen earlier? It seems there is some intentional delay for political purposes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The 5th member was only just appointed earlier this month. So, they only just now have a majority. At least, that's my understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Confirmed by the Senate. Republicans have been holding up the confirmation for quite some time. Biden nominated Anna Gomez in March of this year (link) and she was only confirmed by the Senate in early September.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thanks. The latest delays seem to be intentional from the republicans. But march 2023 seems like far too long since January 2021. Does anyone know what happened in 2021 and 2022? I would not be surprised if it’s because of republicans again but I don’t know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›