all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i would guess that people that deactivate js are fine not using google for search

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This coincides with Google search getting worse and now including the AI slop.

    What's the best alternative to Google these days?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago*

    What’s the best alternative to Google these days?

    I use Kagi, it's great (great results, no ads, no tracking, a lot of clever filtering tools) but it's paid. Free, I would use Brave Search but I doesn't give me as good results as Kagi.

    Edit: added links.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What’s the best alternative to Google these days?

    I think that's like asking what's the best alternative to bread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wish they would fix the bug where I can't click "images" with js disabled

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That no bug. There just no html search for image.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    SearXNG solves this (and many other problems)

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Soon they’re gonna start using Widevine DRM to encrypt the Javascript required to access the search results. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Why it is important to use alternative metadata fetcher like searxng

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Motherf***ers

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Luckily, as of today I can still set my user agent to something like a Playstation or ancient firefox/IE to get a lightweight HTML-based page. The results are in www.google.com/url?q= format but I can use a redirector extension for that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Better abandon google search for something else at this point. Even if alternative search engine calls bing and google, at least they take this BS out of the way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Someone here use still Google for searching? 😳

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    This used to be a great feature for vintage computers. If the machine had internet, you could search with HTTP site instead of HTTPS.

    The alternatives listed here might not require JS, but most if not all of them require SSL. Vintage computers struggle to support that. Anyway, Google is best avoided when possible so hopefully an alternative surfaces .

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean on the list of reasons not to use Google, I feel like this one is pretty low.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Startpage.com does not

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    What does this mean?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Wait this is new? I wasn't able to use google without JS for sometime.

  • source