all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I don’t know if I would count “making an announcement on social media” as stopping the genocide, but I understand that for Trump voters the bar on anything must be very low.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    So why are Democrats already spinning their comments as if Biden is achieving a ceasefire right now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Can you share a link to an example? First time I'm hearing about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I might be blind, where are those articles saying Biden admin solved it? They are saying opposite?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I thought you meant evidence Trump was responsible for the ceasefire. For Democrats trying to claim credit here is an example.

    Trump and Biden both claim credit for Gaza ceasefire deal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We shall see if Trump will cover and lie for Netanyahu like Biden did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you understand the difference between Democrats trying to take credit, and Israelis and Arab sources attributing the credit to Trump?

    One takes credit. The other is given credit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Nothing Trump says means anything, let's check back in a month.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lol sure he will. By letting them finish it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I love that you're out here praising Trump for something that happened before he even enters office. Fucking talk about "mental olympics" lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You do realize Trump sent an envoy to Israel which forced the genocide to stop right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Trump’s plan for ending the genocide is to let Netanyahu complete it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Check back in in a month

    Edit: it’s been 10 days now, but things ain’t goin so hot are they?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Seems more likely he'll just let things devolve further...

    Trump would not elaborate on what he meant by his threat — first announced on social media in early December — that "all hell will break out" if a deal is not made.

    "It will not be good for Hamas, and it will not be good, frankly, for anyone," Trump said. -Source

    Not sure he understands the implications of his own statement...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Stopping a genocide is the opposite of devolving. Trumps statement is a direct threat to Israel. There is no leverage or "worse" for Hamas. Democrats trying to spin Trump stopping the genocide into something bad is comical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Trumps statement is a direct threat to Israel.

    You realize he's literally threatening Hamas here, no?

    "It will not be good for Hamas, and it will not be good, frankly, for anyone," Trump said.

    He seems more likely to stop the genocide by allowing Isreal to just kill everyone so there's no one left to genocide....

    They are more likely to give Israel a lot of leeway, including releasing Biden’s hold on the transfer of certain weapons to finish the job as soon as possible. Source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, let's see what happens.

    I also highly doubt he's gonna do anything. Add on top of that, that very few outside countries seem to care about Trump, much less respect him enough to actually listen to anything he has to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    What did that 'respect' get little old Joey Brandon? All Trump had to do was threaten to cut off the weapons.

    Trump already did something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I’m sure all the money AIPAC gave to Trump has no impact. We know Trump to be such a non-transactional person. You drank a big ass glass of the MAGA koolaid dude. Netanyahu and Trump are very friendly, I’m sure he wants to make it look like Trump brought a cease fire for optics. Israel is losing support all over the world, even in Israel, they were pushing towards the optics of a cease fire for a while. You wait and see what really happens. I’m sure the author of the Muslim ban who constantly decries negatively towards Islam is going to stand up for the poor Islamic state over the rich lucrative Israeli state. 🤦🏻

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Trump gets his funding from Miriam Adelson. the $100 million she gave him is clearly not even close to what the Democrats received. Becacuse Trump is stopping the genocide instantly. Kool aid is supposed to be red but these days it is blue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    They already have weapons, both sides, and America doesn't sit on the worlds supply of weapons. So that will get him nothing.

    His envoy pressing for a ceasefire seems to do very little, as everybody else has been doing the same for a while now.

    What else have you got?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Always weird to see MAGAts on Lemmy…

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Shouldn’t the text read something like, “republicans looking at the receipts for the wall Mexico was supposed to pay for”

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Right after he releases his tax returns, oh wait by his own words he stands by nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Where’s the “sort by most downvotes”? This is absolutely. Is Trump/Musk paying infiltrators? Seriously, dude can’t read the room. What’s going on here?

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source