top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 71 points 2 years ago (14 children)

I still don't understand why this isn't a 2.5G WAN and 2.5G LAN. Is it assuming that people are going to be using it as a router on a stick with a 1G WAN?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [+] 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Just pulled the trigger, only had European plugs in stock. I've got adapters so np. I'm getting it to replace my Raspberry Pi router that I've been using for a few years.

    *Edit, I should say I'm a huge fan openWRT despite the fact that 15 years ago I managed to brick my linksys router so bad it actually caused sparks to shoot out the ethernet jacks. I flashed the wrong model firmware.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Of course, I just bought a new router, your all welcome

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm glad it's open hardware as much as open software, but I think I'll wait to see what the OpenWrt Two looks like.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    This is cool

  • source
  • [–] [S] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The next router I’m getting!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    If only it were a useful hardware configuration.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    So, how is this any better than the Router Mini PCs you can find in Aliexpress (random example)?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Most of those run OpenWrt or PfSense. Assuming the hardware is well-supported by the open source software it runs, there's a argument to be made that there's no difference. There's always the risk of them using some weird chipset that won't be supported in a year's time. The only difference is that the OpenWrt One is specifically designed for OpenWrt with well-supported hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Isn't RAM like the biggest bottleneck in routers causing bufferblaot and packet loss?

    How does the article not mention how much RAM this device has?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Packet loss occurs when a router has to drop some packets because the buffer to store them is running out because the link where they are supposed to go is overloaded.

    Bufferbloat is the issue where you make your queues too deep, i.e. you allocate too much RAM to buffering, while the cause of the buffering still exists, so the deeper queue just fills up anyway, so you haven't improved anything, and have induced extra latency on the packets that do make it trough.

    Deep buffers can help in situations where you have a step down in link speed, but only bursty and not sustained overloading of the slower output link.

    The big bottleneck in router hardware is more about TCAM or HBM memory used to store the FIB of the global routing table. Since the table has grown so much the devices with less high speed memory can't hold the table anymore, and if they start swapping the FIB to normal memory your routing performance goes to shit.

    So not all of your concerns seem to apply to this class of device, but of course you're right, The Register should have mentioned the RAM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

    What's the point of having 1G on WAN and 2.5G on LAN? Traffic won't hit the LAN port until it's routed to the Internet, yet the WAN port is the bottleneck.

    Edit: Seems like I switch up the port speed but my point still holds as the bittleneck still exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    The LAN and WAN ports aren't labelled as such on the device and can be configured to do anything. The 2.5Gb port can also be used to take in PoE so for a lot of people - myself included - this will be the only port that's actually used, or at least the port that will be used the heaviest. The reason, I think, that it's configured as WAN by default is so that the LAN port can be used to plug a laptop in directly without disconnecting the whole network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Mmh only two Ethernet ports? I guess it’s for people who use mostly wifi only?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's just the router, I guess. Provide your own switch for more ports.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Well the router I use today has 4 ports (and a built in modem for that matter, but I don’t use that).
    I understand I can use a switch, but that means I’ll have to buy a switch in addition to this to replace my router.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Which is not a bad thing, it’s more unix if you will. Router is a router, switch is a switch.

    You provide your own switch and you choose the features: port count, port speed, vlan, etc — or get a 10€ switch if you don’t care. When a port breaks you replace the switch alone.

    Multifunction tools are generally a tradeoff where you buy immediate convenience and pay with more ewaste and more money in the long run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    GTFO, clicking on "buy now" two times results in some shop which has "aliexpress" as the official partner.

    This can't be a product from the sources mentioned, can it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    The price is right for sure, but it's still sad they didn't shoot for wifi 7. It was a pretty big leap in latency reduction.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It would be nice if they would make one with 4 or more LAN ports with at least one of them 2.5G and no WiFi. I need multiple access points to get enough coverage. The built in WiFi is useless to me since it won't integrate nicely with Unifi.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Is it available only though aliexpress?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    I love the specs and the pricing. Will definitely check it out.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I need this router.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›