Intriguingly, as the date for the airing of the documentary has drawn near, a number of high-value wallets from the "Satoshi era" have become active for the first time since 2009.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 2 years ago (4 children)

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Not really, all it requires is someone to produce a signed message with one of Satoshi's private keys, which can be easily verified with the public addresses on the blockchain. Whoever produced that message can be proven to possess that private key. Nothing short of that would be believable by the crypto nerds.

    If we presume that Satoshi understood that Bitcoin may be valuable one day and kept the keys private, that would mean that the signer really is Satoshi, or one of his associates or heirs Satoshi trusted wih access. Even if that person wasn't actually Satoshi, their word on who it is would be considered authoritative.

    Unless it's Craig. Fuck that guy. Nobody believes him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That is the extraordinary evidence being referenced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ordinary claims require ordinary evidence, then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, because it's an extraordinary claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    "Extraordinary" means outside the realm of ordinary. Signing a message is very ordinary

    EDIT: Sorry I ment to say: saying "I own a key" is ordinary, and signing a message is the ordinary way to prove you own the key

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I hate how this phrase has been abused so much. There's nothing particularly extraordinary here--we're not talking about bigfoot or aliens--and the whole point of a documentary like this is to lay out evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 91 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They don't know. and the documentary will be bigfoot level speculation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's the twist. It was actually ₿igfoot who invented ₿itcoin, don't you see?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    It's overwhelmingly likely to be someone none of us have ever heard of. If nothing else because that's the base rate. Also because someone nerdy enough to care about this stuff before cryptocurrency existed couldn't possibly have a life.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Did I miss it, or did the article not tell you who it (supposedly) is?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the NSA or other intelligence org invented it and provides ongoing funding to collect an enormous library of SHA256 hashes to aid in reducing the decryption space of SHA256 so they can watch people watching porn.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    That's... that's a Pornhub category right? "Watching people watching porn" has got to be a tab on that site. It's sounds too much like a kink to not be a kink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Watch geraldo rivera, as he finds out what's in Capone's safe!

    (Yes, I'm old)

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Are we doing this again?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's truly not even a mystery.

    There is only one person on earth who had both the skills and experience to create bitcoin, and actually was working to create bitcoin in the months leading up to the white paper.

    That person is Nick Szabo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh please.

    The evidence for Szabo is circumstantial at best. I’ll give you he has the skills and experience and was working on digital currency at the time.

    But Szabo was just one of hundreds of people working on different ideas related to digital currency around the time Bitcoin was released.

    And how many hundreds of people developed their own cryptocurrency after getting the idea from the Bitcoin whitepaper? Clearly he not the only “person on earth who had both the skills and experience”.

    Not to mention Szabo has repeatedly denied being Satoshi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    If it isn't Nick Szabo, it is somebody who has spent years ensuring all clues point to nobody but Nick Szabo, up to and including placing a Satoshi nakamoto statue in a rural Polish town where Nick Szabo's grandfather was born.

    Let's just look at this logically: if you had written the 30+ papers building the ideas that eventually became bitcoin, actually were building bitcoin and months away from releasing, and then had all your work stolen without credit nor citation, you wouldn't be the world's biggest supporter of bitcoin. You would be mad that somebody stole your work and then spent years framing you for its creation.

    The first usage of the word bitcoin was even on Nick Szabo's own blog, under a comment by the user Eddie. This leads to two outcomes: Eddie is Satoshi, or Nick's work wasn't stolen, bit gold is bitcoin and Nick is Satoshi.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Or it was likely not a single individual, but a government contractor. How else could a compartmentalized secret remain so for this long?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The government sucks at keeping secrets despite what the conspiracy nuts say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›