you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 231 points 2 years ago (2 children)

this just in: actually spending money on QA allows you to put out a higher quality product

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 120 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's truly amazing what can happen when they don't cut quite so many corners and release the minimal viable product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure that using the entire QA staff of the world's largest agglomeration of Dev studios on a single game only qualifies as "not cutting corners". That's surely going above and beyond.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If Agile consultant could read they'd be very upset

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I really don’t like the word agile since everyone I ever met who had this in their job title was blowing up steam someones butt. Is that the job description or what is it with these agile types?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Agile used to refer to a very specific way of developing software, but then it got coopted by the mainstream where companies kept doing shit the same way they always had but calling it "agile". It's basically like when early Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments