▲ 1533 ▼ All the other brands went along (slrpnk.net) submitted 2 years ago by blibla@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world 745 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are many PD cables that are bad for doing data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Correct. The other commenter is giving bad advice. Both power delivery and bandwidth are backwards compatible, but they are independent specifications on USB-C cables. You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all. Also, that’s not true for Thunderbolt cables. Each of the 5 versions have specific data and power delivery minimum and maximum specifications. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all. I don't think this is right. The PD standard requires the negotiation of which side is the source and which is the sink, and the voltage/amperage, over those data links. So it has to at least support the bare minimum data transmission in order for PD to work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Technically, yes, data must transmit to negotiate, but it doesn’t require high throughput. So you’ll get USB 2.0 transfer speeds (480 Mb/s) with most “charging only” USB-C cables. That’s only really useful for a keyboard or mouse these days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This limitation comes up sometimes when people try to build out a zero-trust cable where they can get a charge but not necessarily transfer data to or from an untrusted device on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Correct. The other commenter is giving bad advice. Both power delivery and bandwidth are backwards compatible, but they are independent specifications on USB-C cables. You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all. Also, that’s not true for Thunderbolt cables. Each of the 5 versions have specific data and power delivery minimum and maximum specifications. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all. I don't think this is right. The PD standard requires the negotiation of which side is the source and which is the sink, and the voltage/amperage, over those data links. So it has to at least support the bare minimum data transmission in order for PD to work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Technically, yes, data must transmit to negotiate, but it doesn’t require high throughput. So you’ll get USB 2.0 transfer speeds (480 Mb/s) with most “charging only” USB-C cables. That’s only really useful for a keyboard or mouse these days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This limitation comes up sometimes when people try to build out a zero-trust cable where they can get a charge but not necessarily transfer data to or from an untrusted device on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all. I don't think this is right. The PD standard requires the negotiation of which side is the source and which is the sink, and the voltage/amperage, over those data links. So it has to at least support the bare minimum data transmission in order for PD to work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Technically, yes, data must transmit to negotiate, but it doesn’t require high throughput. So you’ll get USB 2.0 transfer speeds (480 Mb/s) with most “charging only” USB-C cables. That’s only really useful for a keyboard or mouse these days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This limitation comes up sometimes when people try to build out a zero-trust cable where they can get a charge but not necessarily transfer data to or from an untrusted device on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Technically, yes, data must transmit to negotiate, but it doesn’t require high throughput. So you’ll get USB 2.0 transfer speeds (480 Mb/s) with most “charging only” USB-C cables. That’s only really useful for a keyboard or mouse these days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This limitation comes up sometimes when people try to build out a zero-trust cable where they can get a charge but not necessarily transfer data to or from an untrusted device on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This limitation comes up sometimes when people try to build out a zero-trust cable where they can get a charge but not necessarily transfer data to or from an untrusted device on the other side. permalink fedilink source parent