you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Just don't point the camera at the jury?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Or let them sit in a separate room

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That would probably be best once Trump realises he can sabotage the whole trial with the use of his camera phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Couldn't members of the public do the same?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    If they're allowed in, then I assume so.

    But they might actually face repercussions for doing so, while Trump feels little people laws are beneath him, and in fairness here, I've not seen a lot in the last 6 years or so that might prove him wrong on that.

    Rich people rarely face consequences. Epstein ran a literal paedo island for 20 years, and it was (probably) only the blackmailing of even richer people that landed him in prison and "suicided".

    Even with all these charges, I reckon the best we can hope for is Trump not being allowed to run the country again, and even then I suspect time and poor shape may take care of that so a judge doesn't have to.

  • source
  • parent