you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    how and when you know it’s a necessity

    I did the math actually. And it seems like mass surveillance will only be justified if homicide rates are higher than 20% ( if 1 out of 5 people die in murder ). And only if surveillance actually stops all the crime ( which it doesn't ) and only if there is nothing less problematic that could be used instead ( which there are plenty techniques, like normal regular investigation, where you ask people around on their own terms ). Basically the math says it isn't justified by an apocalyptic margin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Are you the same Blender Dumbass 2.0 ?

    I am the same blenderdumbass as in odysee.com/@blenderdumbass:f and as in blenderdumbass.org

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    the answer is.. it's subjective, you just make up your own mind, and justify it with : it's a necessity, may Allah forgive me 🥺👉👈

    The answer is when you are in a death situation.

    No wonder, though. It seems like you don't even intend to learn facts about the religion you'll believe in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)