you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

There are a lot of differing opinions on what should be used, LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQ+, LGBTQIA, etc, etc. I appreciate what inclusive acronyms try to do, but it does get very burdensome for non-queer people. I typically just use "queer", personally, though you obviously have to be a little careful with that one depending on context and perhaps it isn't always entirely encompassing. E.g. are intersex people "queer"? They just have abnormal sex chromosomes.

-A queer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    +1 for the simpler queer term.

    There's also GRSM (Gender Relational and Sexual Minorities) which I find much more meaningful than LGBTQIA2S+. First it isn't a mash-up of a load of loosely related terms and, secondly, it also includes D/s relationships or ENM (Ethical Non Monogamy) for example. Sadly it doesn't seem to be getting much traction anywhere ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Personally I've always liked GSRM (Gender, Sexual, and Romantic Minorities). Unfortunately that probably won't catch on anytime soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    GSRM sounds like a knock off of Grand Theft Auto. Where you cause chaos and crime in some Romanian cities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments