He may also not agree with China’s politics but he’s anti-war and critical of NATO.

And understatement and an overstatement IMO.

He said the fall of the USSR was a good thing (praised fucking Reagan). Is against China, not critical of certain politics or policies, he's anti-communist, muh persecution of religious people atrocity nonsense. Muh nonsense about muh authority, etc, etc.

He's critical of NATO in the same way some honest Marxists are critical of AES states while still supporting them. He to my knowledge says Russia is the aggressor (repeating the NATO line is not being nearly critical enough, it's a lack of thinking) in the Ukraine situation, does a both-sides cowardly condemnation and the usual coward's prayer for peace without assigning blame. Neither Washington nor Moscow was a CIA line we must recall.

Compared to like Code-Pink who afaik correctly identify US aggression as being responsible for the Ukraine war, blame the US, and aren't critical of NATO so much as denouncing its existence.

Being anti-war is meaningless, he's not going to win, or take and exercise power. So the only point is his platform, if his platform is vulgar, liberal, non-materialist, doesn't show real solidarity (not meaningless, vague "war bad" which is dropped at moment's notice for a situation like Ukraine or a Taiwan incursion), then what worthwhile message is he spreading?

And yeah maybe he could do some of what Bernie did. I'm just not so sure that wasn't a fairly special moment coming off Obama's nonsense and disillusionment over his false promises, the rise of the alt-right and so many things just seeming wrong to young people who'd been promised Obama would change things and we would never go back to the Bush years and the country was moving forward. Thing is the Democratic party openly sabotaged Bernie so that really caused a lot of people to question things further, they're just plain not going to platform Cornel, maybe one wacky debate with low tier candidates by the media where he gets a few free quips and is mostly ignored by the moderators so I'm not sure the radicalizing potential is there the same as Bernie who was thrown under the bus not once but twice in a row visibly and who had that massive platform on the debate stage with Hillary Clinton. And there was a real feeling "Bernie could have won" vs Trump who did actually win whereas If Biden wins again you won't have that and if Trump wins I don't think you'll have that either. The type of people who Cornel attracts are mostly Democracy Now type rad-libs, green party libs, CIA-synthetic left types who are already safely firewalled from moving onto Marxism and just kind of caught being shepherded around by third party hopes and wasting their lives and efforts organizing around electoralism and a few meaningless protests a year (half of which align with CIA objectives or are not objectionable anyways to them).

Because lets face it. For every former Bernie person (I was one) who became a Marxist by 2020 or 2021 there are probably 10 who became anti-communist, US state dept spouting anarchists.

Maybe I'm being a pessimist, I just think a lot of stars aligned for what happened with Bernie in a perfect storm of shock, rising disillusionment, and blatant bias and manipulation by the media. I think most of the liberals have accepted what's happening, are clinging to Biden and a return to normalcy, institutions, norms, blah, blah, blah. It's a coping mechanism born of trauma and desperation and they've fully bought the Russia-gate myth and fully believe they have to circle the wagons, prioritize saving the institutions above all else. They've been successfully terrorized against the prospect of dramatic change via Trump and fearmongering against him and insinuations anyone pushing for anything too radical is a Russian provocateur and threat to our democracy. And that is intentional, this has been very carefully crafted as the CIA and bourgeoisie are freaked out by the happenings of Bernie and Trump.

I think they might even actually throw Trump in prison and keep him there and the Republican party will rail against it but secretly be relieved. Because they didn't want Bernie, they didn't want Trump, they want to back to Bushes, Biden's, and so on. Usual, reliable suspects who implement reactionary terror at home, reactionary terror abroad but do so with dignity, are seen as reliable, stable, predictable, respecters of institutions and norms, a steady rock for allies (vassals) to moor themselves to.