Budget: $120 million [source]

Opening weekend gross: $4 million

Factoring in marketing costs and the theaters taking their cut of the profits, Megalopolis would need to make at least $300 million to break even. I think it's safe to say that's not happening.

It would have been THE worst opening for a $100 million movie ever, had it not been for Pluto Nash's horriffic opening 22 years ago.

Even The New York Times is reporting near-empty screenings of Megalopolis!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

The trailer made it seem like the kind of pretentiously boring mess that the director seemed to think had some profound message that I tend to really dislike.

Or put more simply, "Looks like the director set $120 million on fire to win Oscars, not make something entertaining."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    From what I'm hearing, one of the antagonists is a thinly veiled Rupert Murdoch. Sounds like $120 million to pretentiously explain that Fox News is bad to an audience who figured that out two decades ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Thinly veiled Rupert Murdoch?

    Bah, 007 did it 27 years ago.

    I really wanted Megalopolis to be good, but I never had high hopes for it. I'll probably still watch it eventually because it has a bunch of actors in it that I love + I'm a sucker for future megacities in movies and games (I'm still not over the fact that they cancelled the Star Wars game that was supposed to take place on the lower levels of Coruscant)

  • source
  • parent