this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024

208 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

8,285 readers

2,531 active

7 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.

Join our Matrix chatroom

Other communities you may be interested in

Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Shit@sh.itjust.works

OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca

fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works

nuke@sh.itjust.works

Estiar@sh.itjust.works

neidu2@feddit.nl

neidu3@sh.itjust.works

Satellite images suggest test of Russian “super weapon” failed spectacularly (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 years ago by threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Poach@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you trying to say the Google maps imagery is not commercial satellite data?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

That's correct. Google Maps imagery is not satellite data, it's airplane photos.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The comment I replied to was talking about spy tech, I was pointing out that the photos were from a commercial satellite, whose specs are likely well known.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Hey, and you’re right about that. It’s what I get for commenting on stuff with 4am insomnia. The photos are clearly credited to Maxar Technologies, which for some reason I know to be a satellite imaging company. (Yet I can’t remember my own zip code without thinking about it.)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago

I think maxar might even be the company Google licenses the Google Earth imagery from

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4