▲ 170 ▼ What weird false belief did you have as a kid? (lemmy.ca) submitted 2 years ago by dullbananas@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 208 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca [S] 29 points 2 years ago (4 children) I thought that apt-get was a wrapper around the apt command permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago It's not? permalink fedilink source parent [–] phanto@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (3 children) Wait... Someone explain things to me! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca [S] 19 points 2 years ago Today I learned that apt is like apt-get but newer permalink fedilink source parent [–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dpkg is the low level tool for Debian packages. Apt-get is the original frontend for dpkg. It is a full featured tool that lets the user give commands to dpkg, along with apt-cache, which displays information to the user. Apt is a high level tool for user friendliness. It combines some features from apt-get and apt-cache, as well as adds progress bars and other quality of life features. It also strips down some features the average user doesn’t use. So neither is a wrapper for the other. They are two similar tools that do the same job. Apt-get is better for scripting due to being a more rigid tool while apt is nicer for end users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phanto@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago Amazing! 16 years with Ubuntu, and now I know! permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) When I started on Debian, there was only apt-get. (And dpkg if you manually pulled .debs from somewhere). Then a little while later, there was aptitude, which was nice. apt the command didn't show up until 2014. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago They just can't make it easy permalink fedilink source parent [–] nul@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago Ah, the innocence of youth. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 point 2 years ago Well, TIL. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (3 children) Wait... Someone explain things to me! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca [S] 19 points 2 years ago Today I learned that apt is like apt-get but newer permalink fedilink source parent [–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dpkg is the low level tool for Debian packages. Apt-get is the original frontend for dpkg. It is a full featured tool that lets the user give commands to dpkg, along with apt-cache, which displays information to the user. Apt is a high level tool for user friendliness. It combines some features from apt-get and apt-cache, as well as adds progress bars and other quality of life features. It also strips down some features the average user doesn’t use. So neither is a wrapper for the other. They are two similar tools that do the same job. Apt-get is better for scripting due to being a more rigid tool while apt is nicer for end users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phanto@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago Amazing! 16 years with Ubuntu, and now I know! permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) When I started on Debian, there was only apt-get. (And dpkg if you manually pulled .debs from somewhere). Then a little while later, there was aptitude, which was nice. apt the command didn't show up until 2014. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago They just can't make it easy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca [S] 19 points 2 years ago Today I learned that apt is like apt-get but newer permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dpkg is the low level tool for Debian packages. Apt-get is the original frontend for dpkg. It is a full featured tool that lets the user give commands to dpkg, along with apt-cache, which displays information to the user. Apt is a high level tool for user friendliness. It combines some features from apt-get and apt-cache, as well as adds progress bars and other quality of life features. It also strips down some features the average user doesn’t use. So neither is a wrapper for the other. They are two similar tools that do the same job. Apt-get is better for scripting due to being a more rigid tool while apt is nicer for end users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phanto@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago Amazing! 16 years with Ubuntu, and now I know! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago Amazing! 16 years with Ubuntu, and now I know! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) When I started on Debian, there was only apt-get. (And dpkg if you manually pulled .debs from somewhere). Then a little while later, there was aptitude, which was nice. apt the command didn't show up until 2014. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago They just can't make it easy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago They just can't make it easy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nul@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago Ah, the innocence of youth. permalink fedilink source parent