▲ 851 ▼ Snap out of it (lemmy.zip) submitted 2 years ago* by 299792458ms@lemmy.zip to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 173 comments fedilink hide all child comments How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution's repositories?
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 80 points 2 years ago (6 children) There is no software that is not in AUR. I use arch, BTW. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Trail@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) But yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Indeed, but don't underestimate my laziness. permalink fedilink source parent [–] hperrin@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) I guess we should have added the word “notable” I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago Ouch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that's it you have your appimage. appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc And that on itself isn't complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I've recently forked and began expanding. I don't know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result. EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn't ready yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago There's so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Rpg paper maker Though the Linux version is now in a “do not use” state. The developer decided to just make it into a web app because it was only working on Ubuntu permalink fedilink source parent [–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Gatekeeping the word "software" here? Here's something not in the AUR. Tested on arch permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35 Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it's in the AUR. No exceptions. Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I don't intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It's not worth it. Maybe I'll make an AppImage at most. I don't know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council. permalink fedilink source parent [–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Someone will put the AppImage in AUR permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is such a weird gatekeeper take permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago i use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it's AUR support) :> permalink fedilink source parent [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://youtu.be/V1mOWypIFRM permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) But yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Indeed, but don't underestimate my laziness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Indeed, but don't underestimate my laziness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Indeed, but don't underestimate my laziness. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) I guess we should have added the word “notable” I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago Ouch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that's it you have your appimage. appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc And that on itself isn't complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I've recently forked and began expanding. I don't know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result. EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn't ready yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago There's so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) I guess we should have added the word “notable” I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago Ouch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that's it you have your appimage. appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc And that on itself isn't complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I've recently forked and began expanding. I don't know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result. EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn't ready yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago Ouch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create? The appimage is basically just git clone -> make -> make install DESTDIR=/path/to/AppDir -> wget appimagecreationtool and finally appimagecreationtool /path/to/AppDir and that's it you have your appimage. appimagecreationtool being several tools that can create the appimage from an AppDir, like linuxdeploy, linuxdeploqt, go-appimage, etc And that on itself isn't complex either, it if basically running ldd on the binary, then copy those libraries into the AppDir and finally run patchelf to patch the paths in the binaries and libraries, suyu uses a deploy script instead of using those tools, which I've recently forked and began expanding. I don't know how easy it is to make a flatpak or snap, but I do know the dev of zen browser hates dealing with the flatpak and iirc right now the flatpak is outdated as result. EDIT: Also lite-xl has been making a flatpak for like 2 years and it isn't ready yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago There's so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Rpg paper maker Though the Linux version is now in a “do not use” state. The developer decided to just make it into a web app because it was only working on Ubuntu permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Gatekeeping the word "software" here? Here's something not in the AUR. Tested on arch permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35 Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it's in the AUR. No exceptions. Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I don't intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It's not worth it. Maybe I'll make an AppImage at most. I don't know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council. permalink fedilink source parent [–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Someone will put the AppImage in AUR permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is such a weird gatekeeper take permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35 Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it's in the AUR. No exceptions. Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I don't intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It's not worth it. Maybe I'll make an AppImage at most. I don't know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council. permalink fedilink source parent [–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Someone will put the AppImage in AUR permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is such a weird gatekeeper take permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I don't intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It's not worth it. Maybe I'll make an AppImage at most. I don't know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council. permalink fedilink source parent [–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Someone will put the AppImage in AUR permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Sorry, I've already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I'll have to report this incident to...the council. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Someone will put the AppImage in AUR permalink fedilink source parent
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is such a weird gatekeeper take permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago i use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it's AUR support) :> permalink fedilink source parent
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://youtu.be/V1mOWypIFRM permalink fedilink source parent