▲ 134 ▼ Biden is 'old,' Trump is 'corrupt': AP-NORC poll has ominous signs for both in possible 2024 rematch (apnews.com) submitted 2 years ago by chronically_crazy@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) AOC, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -24 points 2 years ago (3 children) Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent [+] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -24 points 2 years ago (3 children) Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent [+] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent