▲ 134 ▼ Biden is 'old,' Trump is 'corrupt': AP-NORC poll has ominous signs for both in possible 2024 rematch (apnews.com) submitted 2 years ago by chronically_crazy@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (3 children) Can we please get a non-fascist under 50? Please? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) AOC, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -24 points 2 years ago (3 children) Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent [+] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) John Stewart is over 50, but he would be a great option IMHO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -5 points 2 years ago I see him similar to Sanders where they will give up their power and give in to the DNC easily over time. permalink fedilink source parent [+] chronically_crazy@lemmy.world [S] -15 points 2 years ago (2 children) There is Pete Buttigieg, though he's an incompetent hack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) The best and most accomplished Transportation secretary in U.S. History and you call him incompetent? Interesting take, can you name any former Transportation secretary that was even half as good as Pete? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chakan2@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Uh...really? We've got planes running into each other while on the runways. I wouldn't run around excited about his tenure in transportation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is the Minister of Transport responsible for cockups on runways? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago So your issue with him is ground traffic at airports? Good news, they are working to solve that issue where the previous Transportation Secratary ignored the issue. "We're trying to take a bigger look and do some deeper analysis to see what's going on," Buttigieg told USA TODAY. "It's enough that I'm concerned." Buttigieg noted that there have been a variety of causes, such as pilot error and controller training. "That suggests that there's something happening more broadly, perhaps something related to the increase in activity and demand that took place very quickly after the sudden slowdown around COVID." Acting FAA administrator Billy Nolen, however, told reporters following a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday that it was not clear if runway incursion incidents were on the rise. "It’s a good question," he said, reports CNN. "We’ll take a look at these near misses and see if there are lessons to be learned." permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) That's way too harsh. Pete is an opportunist, and opts for politics over principle to a degree that made me dislike him in the last primary... but he's not incompetent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Incompetent is the correct word. He's a soft R rather than a D. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Have you seen what he has done with the airlines and train disasters? Did you miss all the news going on with airlines/trains? He is incompetent and just like any other politician with no real values, just like all the democrats and republicans. They give in to the fame and the wealthy class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Sorry, what do you think a transportation secretary does? Do you think he's an air traffic controller? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) AOC, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -24 points 2 years ago (3 children) Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent [+] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election: October 13th, 1989. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't know why I thought her birthday was in December. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago We'll blame the Mandela Effect. :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure she does. The issue is that she won't run against a sitting Democratic president. My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can't think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, there's literally minimum requirements to be president that she will not fulfill. Namely, her age. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago She'll be 35 before the election... The rule is you have to be 35 to assume office, not to run a campaign. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -24 points 2 years ago (3 children) Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent [+] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal? Give me a break. I don't like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it's better that they go into this with a united front. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) i mean sure, but that doesn't mean it's not depressing that BIDEN is the most progressive we're allowed to be until january 2029 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago 1000% agree. Depressing. But necessary. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Biden is the most progressive we're ever gonna have until something is done about Congress (specifically the Senate) and House representation re: the Apportionment act and gerrymandering. As long as it still takes Dems 60%+ of the vote to get a bare majority in Congress, it's not going to get any better. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Useless is useless. Only reason we were for him was to fight against the blues to push for real change. Instead he gives in to the DNS/Biden/Obama democrats and demolishes the grassroots movement many of us put a lot of time to help build. He is now just another politician pushing for the lesser of two evils spiel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you think anyone is fooled by this little act you're doing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Guy is all up and down the thread spouting the same crap points. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 2 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) John Stewart is over 50, but he would be a great option IMHO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -5 points 2 years ago I see him similar to Sanders where they will give up their power and give in to the DNC easily over time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -5 points 2 years ago I see him similar to Sanders where they will give up their power and give in to the DNC easily over time. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chronically_crazy@lemmy.world [S] -15 points 2 years ago (2 children) There is Pete Buttigieg, though he's an incompetent hack. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) The best and most accomplished Transportation secretary in U.S. History and you call him incompetent? Interesting take, can you name any former Transportation secretary that was even half as good as Pete? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chakan2@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Uh...really? We've got planes running into each other while on the runways. I wouldn't run around excited about his tenure in transportation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is the Minister of Transport responsible for cockups on runways? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago So your issue with him is ground traffic at airports? Good news, they are working to solve that issue where the previous Transportation Secratary ignored the issue. "We're trying to take a bigger look and do some deeper analysis to see what's going on," Buttigieg told USA TODAY. "It's enough that I'm concerned." Buttigieg noted that there have been a variety of causes, such as pilot error and controller training. "That suggests that there's something happening more broadly, perhaps something related to the increase in activity and demand that took place very quickly after the sudden slowdown around COVID." Acting FAA administrator Billy Nolen, however, told reporters following a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday that it was not clear if runway incursion incidents were on the rise. "It’s a good question," he said, reports CNN. "We’ll take a look at these near misses and see if there are lessons to be learned." permalink fedilink source parent [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) That's way too harsh. Pete is an opportunist, and opts for politics over principle to a degree that made me dislike him in the last primary... but he's not incompetent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Incompetent is the correct word. He's a soft R rather than a D. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Have you seen what he has done with the airlines and train disasters? Did you miss all the news going on with airlines/trains? He is incompetent and just like any other politician with no real values, just like all the democrats and republicans. They give in to the fame and the wealthy class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Sorry, what do you think a transportation secretary does? Do you think he's an air traffic controller? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) The best and most accomplished Transportation secretary in U.S. History and you call him incompetent? Interesting take, can you name any former Transportation secretary that was even half as good as Pete? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chakan2@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Uh...really? We've got planes running into each other while on the runways. I wouldn't run around excited about his tenure in transportation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is the Minister of Transport responsible for cockups on runways? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago So your issue with him is ground traffic at airports? Good news, they are working to solve that issue where the previous Transportation Secratary ignored the issue. "We're trying to take a bigger look and do some deeper analysis to see what's going on," Buttigieg told USA TODAY. "It's enough that I'm concerned." Buttigieg noted that there have been a variety of causes, such as pilot error and controller training. "That suggests that there's something happening more broadly, perhaps something related to the increase in activity and demand that took place very quickly after the sudden slowdown around COVID." Acting FAA administrator Billy Nolen, however, told reporters following a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday that it was not clear if runway incursion incidents were on the rise. "It’s a good question," he said, reports CNN. "We’ll take a look at these near misses and see if there are lessons to be learned." permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chakan2@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Uh...really? We've got planes running into each other while on the runways. I wouldn't run around excited about his tenure in transportation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is the Minister of Transport responsible for cockups on runways? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago So your issue with him is ground traffic at airports? Good news, they are working to solve that issue where the previous Transportation Secratary ignored the issue. "We're trying to take a bigger look and do some deeper analysis to see what's going on," Buttigieg told USA TODAY. "It's enough that I'm concerned." Buttigieg noted that there have been a variety of causes, such as pilot error and controller training. "That suggests that there's something happening more broadly, perhaps something related to the increase in activity and demand that took place very quickly after the sudden slowdown around COVID." Acting FAA administrator Billy Nolen, however, told reporters following a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday that it was not clear if runway incursion incidents were on the rise. "It’s a good question," he said, reports CNN. "We’ll take a look at these near misses and see if there are lessons to be learned." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is the Minister of Transport responsible for cockups on runways? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's kind of his job to put regulations in place to prevent that. Weird it became kind of an epidemic on his watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 point 2 years ago In what world is the Minister taking care of low level things like that? That's like blaming the commander in chief because a squad got deployed to the wrong camp. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago So your issue with him is ground traffic at airports? Good news, they are working to solve that issue where the previous Transportation Secratary ignored the issue. "We're trying to take a bigger look and do some deeper analysis to see what's going on," Buttigieg told USA TODAY. "It's enough that I'm concerned." Buttigieg noted that there have been a variety of causes, such as pilot error and controller training. "That suggests that there's something happening more broadly, perhaps something related to the increase in activity and demand that took place very quickly after the sudden slowdown around COVID." Acting FAA administrator Billy Nolen, however, told reporters following a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday that it was not clear if runway incursion incidents were on the rise. "It’s a good question," he said, reports CNN. "We’ll take a look at these near misses and see if there are lessons to be learned." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) That's way too harsh. Pete is an opportunist, and opts for politics over principle to a degree that made me dislike him in the last primary... but he's not incompetent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chakan2@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Incompetent is the correct word. He's a soft R rather than a D. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Have you seen what he has done with the airlines and train disasters? Did you miss all the news going on with airlines/trains? He is incompetent and just like any other politician with no real values, just like all the democrats and republicans. They give in to the fame and the wealthy class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Sorry, what do you think a transportation secretary does? Do you think he's an air traffic controller? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Incompetent is the correct word. He's a soft R rather than a D. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Have you seen what he has done with the airlines and train disasters? Did you miss all the news going on with airlines/trains? He is incompetent and just like any other politician with no real values, just like all the democrats and republicans. They give in to the fame and the wealthy class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Sorry, what do you think a transportation secretary does? Do you think he's an air traffic controller? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Sorry, what do you think a transportation secretary does? Do you think he's an air traffic controller? permalink fedilink source parent