737
FDA wants to cut sodium in packaged and processed foods by about 20% (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 2 years ago* by to c/news@lemmy.world
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The agency wants to lower how much salt we consume over the next three years to an average of 2,750 milligrams per day. That's still above the recommended limit of 2,300 mg.

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday laid out fresh goals to cut sodium levels in packaged and processed foods  by about 20%, after its prior efforts to address a growing epidemic of diet-related chronic diseases showed early signs of success.

The FDA in October 2021 had set guidelines to trim sodium levels in foods ranging from potato chips to hamburgers in a bid to prevent excessive intake of salt that can trigger high blood pressure, a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke.

The agency is now seeking voluntary curbs from packaged-food makers such as PepsiCo, Kraft Heinz and Campbell Soup. The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The 1980s was a time of great over reporting of unfinished science. From there through the 1990s was a nonstop mood swing over what was good or bad for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Doesn't seem like much has changed since then.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think you’re right, thematically. But we also know a heck of a lot more about all this than we did back then. Much more settled science compared to anecdote or conjecture.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And in the 80s they felt confident what they knew was a heck of a lot more than what was known in the 40s, probably would even have argued it was much more settled science compared to the anecdote and conjecture of yore.

    Personally I am of the opinion that for all our knowledge there is still vastly more we don't know than do, and that we should always try to be mindful of possible ignorance and "of-the-time-ness" of our knowledge in all things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    You’d have been correct then too! But I do think that things are different still. In the late 1970s, medical journals went from anecdote based to evidence based publishing. That surely took time to have an effect and now research physicians are rigorous professional scientists. I’m suggesting that the base is elevated compared to then.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent