you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Sidenote: I hate when people refer to women by their first names and men by their lasts. Would it be so difficult to call it the Harris campaign?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Actually it would because their whole thing is that a brown woman is undeserving of that respect. She needs to be a Proper Minority Woman - pumping out babies (but not too many, as to not out-reproduce white 'Muricans) and being exploited by corporations while supporting her White Alpha Male cuck husband.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    If that's why people refer to politicians by first name, why does everyone say Bernie instead of Sanders? Or Teddy instead of Roosevelt?

    I think the rule is that you get first name treatment if you're further left than a neoliberal, or if you have a more famous relative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Personally, I'm inclined to use Kamala Harris' first name just because it's fun to say. It has a rhythm and repetition to it. Also, we've already had a President Harrison, so it distinguishes her.

    With Hillary Rodham Clinton, I usually used her first name, initials, or full name to distinguish her from her husband. As much as I loath that she was always in his shadow, she was a force to be reckoned with. They may be a power couple, but she deserves her own recognition.

    As for Tim Walz, Tim is just too common and uninteresting. Walz has character and it's close to waltz.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments