▲ 899 ▼ MAGA world is really mad that Trump is no longer running against Biden (www.businessinsider.com) submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 336 comments fedilink hide all child comments Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris. Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden. Biden's withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 239 points 2 years ago* (1 child) GOP: "Your candidate is unfit for office." Dems: "Okay, we got a new candidate." GOP: shocked pikachu permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 99 points 2 years ago (3 children) No no not like that! We're going to sue! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@feddit.nl 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're going to, probably in every single red state. They're going to throw so much shit at the wall due to election ballot timing that unfortunately I think something will stick.. it more than likely wont be legitimate, but we have way too many corrupt judges out there :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago I don't think it's a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination. Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists... permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please get me out of this state permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago Don't you have legs? permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy's doomed, then! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol. If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em permalink fedilink source parent [–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 child) They aren’t going to sue. They are going to start shooting. They’ve outright stated that. It’s crystal clear: they’ve said that the revolution would be “bloodless” only if the left “allowed” it to be. I really wanted to live long enough to build a family,. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it's "unlawful" in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it) How much you want to bet that this only will be "unlawful" in red governmental shithole states He's basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party's interest if these "challenges" come to them. Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) Some of us live in those red shitholes. Send help. Please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it's not a good look. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're just trying to rile up their base that this is "cheating" so that they come out to vote in outrage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] edgarde@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* They're ginning up arguments about "cheating" in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump's unique voter constituency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 99 points 2 years ago (3 children) No no not like that! We're going to sue! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@feddit.nl 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're going to, probably in every single red state. They're going to throw so much shit at the wall due to election ballot timing that unfortunately I think something will stick.. it more than likely wont be legitimate, but we have way too many corrupt judges out there :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago I don't think it's a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination. Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists... permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please get me out of this state permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago Don't you have legs? permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy's doomed, then! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol. If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em permalink fedilink source parent [–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 child) They aren’t going to sue. They are going to start shooting. They’ve outright stated that. It’s crystal clear: they’ve said that the revolution would be “bloodless” only if the left “allowed” it to be. I really wanted to live long enough to build a family,. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it's "unlawful" in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it) How much you want to bet that this only will be "unlawful" in red governmental shithole states He's basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party's interest if these "challenges" come to them. Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) Some of us live in those red shitholes. Send help. Please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it's not a good look. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're just trying to rile up their base that this is "cheating" so that they come out to vote in outrage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] edgarde@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* They're ginning up arguments about "cheating" in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump's unique voter constituency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're going to, probably in every single red state. They're going to throw so much shit at the wall due to election ballot timing that unfortunately I think something will stick.. it more than likely wont be legitimate, but we have way too many corrupt judges out there :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago I don't think it's a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination. Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists... permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please get me out of this state permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago Don't you have legs? permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy's doomed, then! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol. If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago I don't think it's a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination. Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please get me out of this state permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago Don't you have legs? permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy's doomed, then! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol. If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please get me out of this state permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago Don't you have legs? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy's doomed, then! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. "Well they weren't on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Ironically, this is where the SC's ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn't have the power to disqualify someone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Lincoln wasnt on the ballots for the Southe- motherfuckers better not pull that shit again! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol. If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em permalink fedilink source parent
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 child) They aren’t going to sue. They are going to start shooting. They’ve outright stated that. It’s crystal clear: they’ve said that the revolution would be “bloodless” only if the left “allowed” it to be. I really wanted to live long enough to build a family,. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it's "unlawful" in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it) How much you want to bet that this only will be "unlawful" in red governmental shithole states He's basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party's interest if these "challenges" come to them. Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) Some of us live in those red shitholes. Send help. Please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it's not a good look. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it's "unlawful" in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it) How much you want to bet that this only will be "unlawful" in red governmental shithole states He's basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party's interest if these "challenges" come to them. Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) Some of us live in those red shitholes. Send help. Please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it's not a good look. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) Some of us live in those red shitholes. Send help. Please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it's stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass. While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense. I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too. Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a "riot shield," basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That's the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I'm at. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Not that I'm advocating for training with intent cause there's far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn't dare to own one. Much less train to use one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Carry isn't the right word here. I have a 6' x 2' x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It's technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds. I don't take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house. Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago My dude, that is some mall ninja shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06 The uhh, automatic shotgun??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don't buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain't nobody carrying armor like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Carry isn't the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is "mobile" in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent [+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago Exactly. It's not. And they know it. The fact they're trying to run to their judges means they are scared. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it's not a good look. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're just trying to rile up their base that this is "cheating" so that they come out to vote in outrage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] edgarde@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* They're ginning up arguments about "cheating" in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump's unique voter constituency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] edgarde@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* They're ginning up arguments about "cheating" in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump's unique voter constituency. permalink fedilink source parent