▲ 268 ▼ Hacktivists release two gigabytes of Heritage Foundation data (Project 2025) (cyberscoop.com) submitted 2 years ago by remington@beehaw.org [M] to c/technology@beehaw.org 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] luckystarr@feddit.org 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) I wonder if a verifiable link to Trump can be made through network (as in graphs) analysis of the people and their connections in that list. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's an official act, so total immunity applies. What isn't an official act you say? Well that's a good question, but simply put anything that isn't an unofficial act. But then what's an unofficial act I hear you ask? I'll let you know once we have found one, but so far none have been found and it's possible none exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pythonoob@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago He's not currently president, so it wouldn't be an official act, no? The wording doesn't give the president immunity for life. It has to be something done through the office of the president. permalink fedilink source parent [–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Would that make a difference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] luckystarr@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Doubtful, but, though unlikely, perhaps some media house would want to pick it up? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's an official act, so total immunity applies. What isn't an official act you say? Well that's a good question, but simply put anything that isn't an unofficial act. But then what's an unofficial act I hear you ask? I'll let you know once we have found one, but so far none have been found and it's possible none exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pythonoob@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago He's not currently president, so it wouldn't be an official act, no? The wording doesn't give the president immunity for life. It has to be something done through the office of the president. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pythonoob@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago He's not currently president, so it wouldn't be an official act, no? The wording doesn't give the president immunity for life. It has to be something done through the office of the president. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago He's not currently president, so it wouldn't be an official act, no? The wording doesn't give the president immunity for life. It has to be something done through the office of the president. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Would that make a difference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] luckystarr@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Doubtful, but, though unlikely, perhaps some media house would want to pick it up? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luckystarr@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Doubtful, but, though unlikely, perhaps some media house would want to pick it up? permalink fedilink source parent