▲ 347 ▼ Anon watches an American flick (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 122 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's not an American thing that's a movie/TV making 101 thing, it's for lighting reasons at night, I guess it's this person's first day watching movies. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 years ago (2 children) I was literally in a movie recently with inexplicably wet streets, and the director said it was because the extra reflected light looks great on film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Yeah, and it does. It's WAY more eye catching. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) by film do you mean vhs, betamax and video2000 or something else permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hakobo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Those aren't film, they're tape. Film is what's in the camera or shown through a projector and are visible to the naked eye. VHS, Betamax, and video2000 are magnetic tape formats that aren't viewable with the naked eye. Regardless, "on film" is still a universally acceptable term for "on the recorded video" no matter the format because terms stick around in industries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bonus trivia: not all older videos were shot in “film”. That is why some 80’s music videos on YouTube look great, while others not so much (other things being equal). The “film” ones can be re-scanned at a higher resolution and retain a lot of the original detail if the originals are around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago IMAX. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 years ago (2 children) I was literally in a movie recently with inexplicably wet streets, and the director said it was because the extra reflected light looks great on film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Yeah, and it does. It's WAY more eye catching. permalink fedilink source parent [+] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) by film do you mean vhs, betamax and video2000 or something else permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hakobo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Those aren't film, they're tape. Film is what's in the camera or shown through a projector and are visible to the naked eye. VHS, Betamax, and video2000 are magnetic tape formats that aren't viewable with the naked eye. Regardless, "on film" is still a universally acceptable term for "on the recorded video" no matter the format because terms stick around in industries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bonus trivia: not all older videos were shot in “film”. That is why some 80’s music videos on YouTube look great, while others not so much (other things being equal). The “film” ones can be re-scanned at a higher resolution and retain a lot of the original detail if the originals are around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago IMAX. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Yeah, and it does. It's WAY more eye catching. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) by film do you mean vhs, betamax and video2000 or something else permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hakobo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Those aren't film, they're tape. Film is what's in the camera or shown through a projector and are visible to the naked eye. VHS, Betamax, and video2000 are magnetic tape formats that aren't viewable with the naked eye. Regardless, "on film" is still a universally acceptable term for "on the recorded video" no matter the format because terms stick around in industries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bonus trivia: not all older videos were shot in “film”. That is why some 80’s music videos on YouTube look great, while others not so much (other things being equal). The “film” ones can be re-scanned at a higher resolution and retain a lot of the original detail if the originals are around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago IMAX. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hakobo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Those aren't film, they're tape. Film is what's in the camera or shown through a projector and are visible to the naked eye. VHS, Betamax, and video2000 are magnetic tape formats that aren't viewable with the naked eye. Regardless, "on film" is still a universally acceptable term for "on the recorded video" no matter the format because terms stick around in industries permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bonus trivia: not all older videos were shot in “film”. That is why some 80’s music videos on YouTube look great, while others not so much (other things being equal). The “film” ones can be re-scanned at a higher resolution and retain a lot of the original detail if the originals are around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bonus trivia: not all older videos were shot in “film”. That is why some 80’s music videos on YouTube look great, while others not so much (other things being equal). The “film” ones can be re-scanned at a higher resolution and retain a lot of the original detail if the originals are around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Uh so what are older (I'm assuming before digital) videos shot on if not film? *Wait do you mean like old tv shows? I think some of those were shot on tape. permalink fedilink source parent