▲ 132 ▼ ChatGPT would have been so much useful and trustworthy if it is able to accept that it doesn't know an answer. (programming.dev) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments Small rant : Basically, the title. Instead of answering every question, if it instead said it doesn't know the answer, it would have been trustworthy.
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Have it cite it's source. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] kromem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It will make up citations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You go, and read the citations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even with early GPT-4 it would also cite real citations that weren't actually about the topic. So you may be doing a lot of work double checking as opposed to just looking into an answer yourself from the start. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago It's a tool, not a genie. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I didn't mean to cause any confusion, but what I said before was utter bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jh34@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If you use kagi its AI gives sources https://kagi.com/fastgpt https://imgur.com/TYQErhC permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It will make up citations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You go, and read the citations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even with early GPT-4 it would also cite real citations that weren't actually about the topic. So you may be doing a lot of work double checking as opposed to just looking into an answer yourself from the start. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago It's a tool, not a genie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You go, and read the citations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even with early GPT-4 it would also cite real citations that weren't actually about the topic. So you may be doing a lot of work double checking as opposed to just looking into an answer yourself from the start. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago It's a tool, not a genie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even with early GPT-4 it would also cite real citations that weren't actually about the topic. So you may be doing a lot of work double checking as opposed to just looking into an answer yourself from the start. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago It's a tool, not a genie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I didn't mean to cause any confusion, but what I said before was utter bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jh34@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If you use kagi its AI gives sources https://kagi.com/fastgpt https://imgur.com/TYQErhC permalink fedilink source parent