173
Europe’s sweeping rules for tech giants are about to kick in. Here’s how they work (english.elpais.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/europe@feddit.de
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Good, long overdue.

Is there anything on the accompanying Digital Markets Act and it's effects? I can't seem to find any comprehensive recent articles.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 59 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I’ve been following this from the perspective of iOS and iPhones. In effect this will enable one to:

    • Install any software without prejudice or gates. Apple cannot, for example, require developers to register with Apple, or pay them a fee.

    • Install any app store and choose to make it default.

    • Use third party payment providers and choose to make them default.

    • Use any voice assistant and choose to make it default.

    • User any browser and browser engine and choose to make it default.

    • Use any messaging app and choose to make it default.

    • Make core messaging functionality interoperable. They lay out concrete examples like file transfer.

    • Use existing hardware and software features without competitive prejudice. E.g. NFC.

    • Not preference their services. This includes CTAs in settings to encourage users to subscribe to Gatekeeper services, and ranking their own services above others in selection and advertising portals.

    • Much, much, more.

    It’s one of the most impressive, most expansive pieces of technology focused legislation in my lifetime. They’ve really done a great job of covering all bases.

    I expect these to be available next month when the latest version of iOS drops. The deadline is in February/March. If they don’t get this out the door soon, they risk 20% of global revenue as a fine. It would be foolish to wait until the deadline as any issues with deployment would risk the fine, and the EU is eager make an example.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Do you have a source for your list? The article doesn't mention anything.

    If apple complies that would be huge!! Funnily enough if they would comply I might just be interested in an iPhone for the first time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Use any messaging app and choose to make it default. Make core messaging functionality interoperable. They lay out concrete examples like file transfer.

    I've read some things like this. Is it correct that messaging services will need to interoperate? WhatsApp, Messenger, iMessage? Would love to be able to message people that I can't easily reach now from Signal for instance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Just a caveat on this point: they must enable interoperability. They don't have to build the integration. In practise, it will likely mean exposing a messaging API. Other messaging apps will likely integrate, but this will take time. I should mention that there might be some creative ways to work around this, though the EU takes a dim view of malicious compliance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •