7
I actually find this talking point so braindead that, to this day, I still have a hard time believing that people genuinely believe it. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 years ago* by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

Wait, do people really care if Nazis were left or right-wing?

Their leader was a racist mass murderer with superiority complex, who cares about his political views?

Let's say they were left-wing... Does that make the left wing Nazis? Mmm no. If a dictator is right-wing, does that make the right-wing dictators? No.

Do people understand these are two unrelated things? Imagine seeing a dog owner cheating on his wife and assuming all dog owners are cheaters.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The caveat is that being a "racist mass murderer with a superiority complex" is a very right-wing thing. It wouldn't be possible to fit that mold and be leftist because it's entirely incompatible with leftist ideology.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    So you're saying that racism and mass murder did not exist under communist China?

    What about Russification in the Soviet Union? Minorities were marginalized.

    Why would it be a problem if the Nazis were actually left-wing? You're not realizing you're actually a victim of a fallacy. And even more concerning, you're trying to use the same fallacy to attack back. It's just flawed logic all over the place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    As I understand it the keystone between left and right is that:
    The left belief is that all people are created equal and should have equal authority to point out wrong doing. The right belief is that people should be in a hierarchy with people at the top exerting control downward.

    I think they are actually just saying if you really believe everyone is equal you can't pick a group to target for mass murder. But if you are at the top of a pyramid tge people below you naturally look expendable.

    At least that is my reading of this debate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    And my point was that even in the left, murder, discrimination and racism can exist.

    People just choose to think their position is ideal and the opposition is flawed. This type of brainwashing is disgusting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    "I don't like nazis"

    "YEAH? Whatabout Commies?! Huh? HUH?"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    What? I'm just saying that being racist or a murderer is totally unrelated to political views. Those can happen in both the left and right.

    Guys, you're smarter than this. For real.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The conversation is about nazis. You keep trying to talk about communists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I said it doesn't matter if the Nazis were right wing or left wing, what matters is that they were criminals. Then that person said that mass murder and racism is only aligned with the right, so I showed him/her that that is wrong, murder and racism can also happen on the left.

    The point being that just because in the past there were rotten apples in the left/right, it doesn't mean that being in the left/right makes you a rotten apple.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Ok, so if it is important to keep awareness, why did people get triggered here when I pointed out that there have also been murderers, racists and dictators in the left? Is it fine to keep awareness only for the opposition?

    Keeping an eye on this is exactly the type of fear that the Republicans use to suppress the left. "A leftist president? Have you seen North Korea?"

    It's just flawed logic.

    The only logic that has created the perfect conditions for racists in power is exactly this type of discrimination based on past examples.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Hilarious how people who know exactly one "racist mass murderer with a superiority complex" assume that it is a right-wing thing. Try humanities most famous left-winger ever.

    Im not saying that nazis and right-wing are unrelated, but you picked exactly those characteristics in Hitler that actually arent related to political views at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Thats not the point, youre twisting the order. Every nazi is right-wing, by definition. Not every right-winger is a nazi and thats not what people are saying. A big part of nazi ideology is overlapping with general right-wing ideologies, they are separate but not unrelated at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    You don't understand. What I'm saying is that you shouldn't care about it. Do you care if the North Korean dictator is left-wing? No? Good, you shouldn't. The same way you shouldn't care if Nazis were right-wing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Do you care if the North Korean dictator is left-wing?

    Kim Jong-Un is right wing. So were Kim Jong Il, Kim Il Sung, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Xi, and Che Guevara. In fact, they were all moderate Republicans whose ideas are 100% in line with the current Republican Party platform. There's no daylight at all between any of them and Ronald Wilson Reagan.

    Before you respond, remember that you don't care what their politics are because it doesn't matter.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Dafuq, North Korea is left wing. OK, so was the Soviet Union also right wing when they marginalized minorities through Russification?

    "if it is bad, it is right-wing".

    And yes, my whole point is that the fact North Korea has a left-wing dictatorship doesn't mean that all left-wing parties will become dictatorships. You finally got my point, damn, it took you so long.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    North Korea is 100% a right wing country, right wing policies and a dictator. You can't argue with that fact.

    Stalin claimed his government was left wing and Marx based but it was revealed that he was right leaning, a dictator and instilled right wing policies.

    https://www.salon.com/2021/08/14/republicans-claim-to-fear-left-wing-authoritarianism--but-theres-no-such-thing/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ah ok, as I said, "everything that is left wing is good and paradise. Everything right wing is pure evil".

    In a left-wing state the state always holds the power... So once that state becomes corrupted and uses that power to keep all workers equally poor, then it is suddenly right wing? Show me what were the capitalist principles in the Soviet Union? Was there a free market, private incentive, private property, competition, minimal state intervention, entrepreneurship, individual rights and freedoms? NOOO THERE WEREN'T. It wasn't a right-wing state.

    You guys are insane. Lemmy became an echo chamber for your delusions. It's really sad to see people this radicalized.

    A dictator is a dictator, who the fuck cares if they are right or left wing? A racist is a racist. A murderer is a murderer. They can be found in any side of the political spectrum, but you're too biased to believe the left can be corrupted... You are too blinded by what is right and what is left and are totally unable to see there can be combinations of ideologies.

    You say dictators are right wing because they don't follow some left-wing principles? Then I could argue that all dictators are left-wing because by definition the right strives to minimize government controls, and a dictatorship is authoritarian, which goes against right-wing policies... But I'm done arguing. This is my last Lemmy comment. You are so blinded by the left vs right argument you can't see beyond that. This degree of fanatism can't be healthy, I don't want to become radicalized like you people. This self imposed blindness is sad and pathetic. Good bye.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like you're being deliberately obtuse. You're right in that by itself trying to define the nazi party of the past in terms of present day left/right ideology is reductivist, and unproductive in discourse. But you're ignoring two important facts in the present day right/left dynamic. First that literal modern day nazis have shown a distinct preference for right wing ideaology. Second is that fascism as an ideology is a chameleon that latches onto present day conflict to unite people through oppression of a weak other, which is the basis for present day right wing policy. As such the comparison becomes apt because the fascists of the past are a model for the fascists of the present.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    OK, by that same logic the left-wing dictators and collapsed systems of the past are a model for the present. So is the right justified to push fear with those past examples to show how bad the left is?

    Do you see that's just the same flawed logic they use to scare people away from the left?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'd argue that you should very much care about the political alignment of extremist leaders, because it show you where an ideology can ultimately lead to if left unchecked. As the poster above said, it doesn't mean that all right-wing people are nazis, but knowing the nazis were right-wing shows you where a right-wing government can end up if the wrong set of conditions happen to come along. This is important information, as you can spot the warning signs as they appear and (hopefully) nip it in the bud before it gets to that point.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    They are behaving like Nazis regardless of if the Nazis were right-wing or left-wing. Nazi behavior can happen in the left or the right. As I already said, discrimination, murder, superiority complex, racism and exploration has also happened in left-wing systems.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Of course bad things happen at the extremes of both sides, but I'm going to have to object to "regardless of if the Nazis were right-wing or left-wing." I don't think there's really room to equivocate on that - nazism is right-wing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    It is. Just like fascism, these are terms associated with the right-wing. But that's not my point... My point is that whatever affiliation the right or left had in the past does not necessarily represent the current affiliations. The fact that the US right-wing is turning to white supremacy is unrelated to Nazis being right wing. That is just a reflection of their systemic racism.

    What I'm saying is that it is irrelevant if Republicans are trying to associate the left with Nazis, because even if such association existed, it is not a valid argument to say that the left today is ruled by Nazis, or that the right can't behave like Nazis. That's just a fallacy, the same fallacy that they use to point out that voting left will turn us into North Korea or an authoritarian left-wing dictatorship.

    I can't believe people aren't getting this. It's like they don't understand I'm actually pro-left with this argument, somehow they think I'm protecting Nazis and Republicans because I'm not shouting "REPUBLICANS BAD!"

    Going back and pointing out how Nazis were right-wing is something that will bite the left in the ass because there are plenty of examples of the left turning into shit too. So instead of comparing with past examples, just analyze their current positions. Is the right currently behaving like Nazis? Yes. Do you need WWII Nazis to be right wing for this to be a fact? No. So even if they convince people that Nazis were left wing, how does that disprove that RIGHT NOW they are the racists and white supremacists?

    I'm just saying, don't play their games.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Let me clarify. To be crystal clear, we're talking about "left" and right on the political compass. It's not a perfect system, but it's the most well known one. Overall, "left" and "right" are bizarre terminologies with aqueous meanings deeply embedded in history.

    You are technically correct if you are talking about the political compass. we call "authoritarian left" "Stalinism" and we call "libertarian right" "anarcho-capitalism" or just "libertarianism" in the US.

    The problem is that all philosophy founding "leftist ideology" has consistently been "libertarian left", focusing on collapsing hierarchies, dividing power into many hands, and dismantling power structures (such as currency). Anarchism is basically the prime example.

    With Marx's communism, his end game is a system without any government, where people simply exchange services and collaborate to create only what they want or need (not to endlessly proliferate waste for profit). Even his "dictatorship of the proletariat", one of the stepping stones to communism, is a democratic system. It is called a "dictatorship" because it revokes the voting rights of the rich.

    To boot, the ideologies which exist in the "authoritarian left" and "libertarian right" are full of contradictions and mental gymnastics. They all swear they're communist but make no attempts to actually disseminate power, or gear towards a more democratic system, directly going against Marx's ideals.

    Because of this, pretty much every leftist agrees that the "authoritarian left" are not leftist, because they directly betray the philosophy which founds leftist beliefs.

    SO to conclude, there is literally no world where someone can genuinely believe the various philosophies within leftism while at the same time starting a campaign alienating minorities, appealing to the general population with populism and returning the state to a former glory, and embarking on a Nazi take-over. This is why Nazism and leftism are completely incompatible, and why literally no Authoritarian can be considered a leftist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent