▲ 1098 ▼ Hot Potato License (jlai.lu) submitted 2 years ago by Mubelotix@jlai.lu to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, that should read "all other citizens of earth". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure it means exactly what it says, but you lot are all misreading it. I interpret it as "all rights, except the right to commit, are reserved" (which doesn't mean you surrender the right to commit, but rather that it's the only right you aren't depriving everyone else of) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I'm pretty sure that the name "hot potato license" and the comment above the license are very strong indicators for this not being the case. The license is meant to mimic a game of hot potato where you get the code for a short moment (one commit) and have to throw it to someone else. Sure, the analogy doesn't quite work because you can't decide who has to make the next commit but it would make even less sense if you were able to keep control over the code and add more and more commits. That would defeat the whole point of naming it "hot potato license". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago No it wouldn't. Whoever touched it last is responsible for it, that's entirely consistent with the metaphore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure it means exactly what it says, but you lot are all misreading it. I interpret it as "all rights, except the right to commit, are reserved" (which doesn't mean you surrender the right to commit, but rather that it's the only right you aren't depriving everyone else of) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I'm pretty sure that the name "hot potato license" and the comment above the license are very strong indicators for this not being the case. The license is meant to mimic a game of hot potato where you get the code for a short moment (one commit) and have to throw it to someone else. Sure, the analogy doesn't quite work because you can't decide who has to make the next commit but it would make even less sense if you were able to keep control over the code and add more and more commits. That would defeat the whole point of naming it "hot potato license". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago No it wouldn't. Whoever touched it last is responsible for it, that's entirely consistent with the metaphore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I'm pretty sure that the name "hot potato license" and the comment above the license are very strong indicators for this not being the case. The license is meant to mimic a game of hot potato where you get the code for a short moment (one commit) and have to throw it to someone else. Sure, the analogy doesn't quite work because you can't decide who has to make the next commit but it would make even less sense if you were able to keep control over the code and add more and more commits. That would defeat the whole point of naming it "hot potato license". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago No it wouldn't. Whoever touched it last is responsible for it, that's entirely consistent with the metaphore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago No it wouldn't. Whoever touched it last is responsible for it, that's entirely consistent with the metaphore permalink fedilink source parent