you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What happen when the repository is getting forked? Goofing with the license is all haha fun till nasty lawyers get into the picture and you get all sort of liability claims

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Just writing words doesn't make it legally binding. Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Oh shit, what's your PayPal?

    Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD and a kiss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't have 2 mil, how do I get out of this? File for bankruptcy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    on a technicality, debts like this are not legally dischargable through bankruptcy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Ofcourse its legally binding. If you include a license text with your own code on a platform that doesnt have a clause to license your code under different terms, then that license is legally valid.

    But writing the license yourself without making sure that it doesnt allow for any legal loopholes is a bad idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    You declaring a debt isn't meaningful because you don't have legal authority to do so.

    A licence statement is describing in what way you're granting permission for something you do have the right to control, which makes it meaningful

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    What happen when the repository is getting forked?

    You get two code bases with different ownership.

    That's a very practical license, that reflects the concept as it is practiced. It's probably the only one that doesn't come from an ivory tower.

  • source
  • parent