you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

This is tough, the goal should be to reduce child abuse. It's unknown if AI generated CP will increase or reduce child abuse. It will likely encourage some individuals to abuse actual children while for others it may satisfy their urges so they don't abuse children. Like everything else AI, we won't know the real impact for many years.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    How do you think they train models to generate CSAM?

    Some of yall need to lookup what an LoRA is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Lol you don't need to train it ON CSAM to generate CSAM. Get a clue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It should be illegal either way, to be clear. But you think theyre not training models on CSAM? Youre trusting in the morality/ethics of people creating AI generated child pornography?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The use of CSAM in training generative AI models is an issue no matter how these models are being used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The training doesn't use csam, 0% chance big tech would use that in their dataset. The models are somewhat able to link concept like red and car, even if it had never seen a red car before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, with models like SD at least, the datasets are large enough and the employees are few enough that it is impossible to have a human filter every image. They scrape them from the web and try to filter with AI, but there is still a chance of bad images getting through. This is why most companies install filters after the model as well as in the training process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    You make it sound like it is so easy to even find such content on the www. The point is, they do not need to be trained on such material. They are trained on regular kids, so they know their sizes, faces, etc. They're trained on nude bodies, so they also know how hairless genitals or flat chests look like. You don't need to specifically train a model on nude children to generate nude children.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    I suggest you actually download stable diffusion and try for yourself because it's clear that you don't have any clue what you're talking about. You can already make tiny people, shaved, genitals, flat chests, child like faces, etc. etc. It's all already there. Literally no need for any LoRAs or very specifically trained models.

  • source
  • parent