45
[Pompey] It’s official. The NBA has fined James Harden $100,000 for public comments. (twitter.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/nba@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The NBA announced today that Philadelphia 76ers guard James Harden has been fined $100,000 by the NBA for public comments on August 14 and 17 indicating that he would not perform the services called for under his player contract unless traded to another team. The league's investigation, which included an interview of Harden, confirmed that these comments referenced Harden's belief that the 76ers would not accommodate his request to be traded.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

$100K is a huge amount of money for me. For Harden, not so much. Compared to the PG-13 crap players are routinely fined tens of thousands of dollars for (which I don't necessarily agree with), $100K seems surprisingly little for how unprecedented Harden's comments were - although I'm not sure of what technical grounds the league has for fining him. If they wanted to hit him with a harsher penalty, they'd suspend him, but they can't do that without Harden's team (6ers, I presume) taking a massive collateral hit

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Usually the amount of fines the league can collect is defined in the CBA.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    That makes sense. A quick internet search suggests that the $100K handed to Harden is indeed 100% of the max player fine per the CBA. Also, the current CBA, which expires this year I think, took effect July 1, 2017.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It would make more sense to scale with the player's salary, but which owner is really going to negotiate super hard for something like that?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Actually, I think the owners would be all for something like that - they'd probably be able to exercise more control over superstars. It's players who I don't think would want that. Some make lots of money, others aspire to. Currently, rookies get their tech fines paid off by the team or vet players, I'm pretty sure, or at least I'm pretty sure that's how they do it on the Raptors

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Yeah the owners would want it, but to negotiate power like that you gotta give something up. I just think it's such a rare occurrence that you'd want to fine a guy more than $100k that it's not a big priority.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    pretty sure we’re in the new CBA rules now. but i don’t think fines have changed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    There was a mutual option this year that both sides picked up. The current CBA, started in 2017, expires at the end of this NBA year
    (Edit: I was incorrect here, see below)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    the new cba started July 1, that's when the league calendar flipped to 23-24.

    https://twitter.com/nbapr/status/1674149843915141127?s=61&t=4iOWcg_cjl7r7NFOLo26ew

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •