▲ 184 ▼ Telegram apparently censor queer groups (mastodon.social) submitted 2 years ago by DaseinPickle@leminal.space to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 27 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://leminal.space/post/6433881
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why though? In case of a public chat or a chat with at least few dozens of users it'll already be excessive if it could work at all. For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups. Like really P2P or E2E? Yep real P2P. The design is inspired by BitTorrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups. I get that but it kind of defeats the purpose. If your group is so small that it's worth it for every member to approve new ones then it probably doesn't produce enough content for each new member to care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 years ago See, we're already the Messenger Working Group 😂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups. I get that but it kind of defeats the purpose. If your group is so small that it's worth it for every member to approve new ones then it probably doesn't produce enough content for each new member to care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 years ago See, we're already the Messenger Working Group 😂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 years ago See, we're already the Messenger Working Group 😂 permalink fedilink source parent