you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

In this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.

Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments