837
AirTag again exposes lies told by airlines about lost luggage (appleinsider.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I'm still trying to figure out why they don't already use trackers. RFID tags are dirt cheap and it's 20 years old technology. They already have a process where they add barcode stickers at checkin, slap some RFID in there too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    They certainly can and do use a tracking system.

    I get notifications from Delta every time my bag moves once it's checked in - loaded, unloaded, what pickup.

    There's nothing really wrong with barcodes. NFC/RFID would be a logical upgrade though, and just has to integrate into the existing system.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You have to change a lot of equipment to make it useful. Most major airports have very complicated machinery that uses the barcodes, which feeds into the baggage handlers. I don't know how they fix that machinery to make BLE worth it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago*

    They don't have to convert their entire luggage handling setup to RFID, just use it to augment their lost luggage detection.

    Add RFID readers at strategic points and feed their data into a computer, which in turn feeds it to a replicated database. When a piece of luggage is lost look in that database to see where's the last RFID blip. Also very easy to let the customer see their luggage positions on a website.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I think you mean BLE. As far as I understand it, RFID doesn't have any particular advantage over barcodes for tracking luggage.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    Barcodes need line of sight with scanners and close range. RFID detectors can sense tags at larger distances and just based on general proximity.

    BLE is also an option, comparison to RFID would depend on setup particularities. RFID would be the more natural choice for throwaway, recyclable stickers that just need to store a short "dumb" ID.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent