you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

As it is, the first time this was posted, biologists and pharmacists discussed the merits of the claims and came to the conclusion that this was unlikely to be real.

Specifically the approach would probably be thwarted the second time you attempted to use this method because your immune system would attack the vaccine.

The discussion also pointed out that this was why the second dose of Astrazeneca during the COVID pandemic was less effective.

Disclaimer: I'm not a medical professional and don't pretend to be one online. I'm reciting from memory. YMMV.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 33 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

    As it is, the first time this was posted, biologists and pharmacists discussed the merits of the claims and came to the conclusion that this was unlikely to be real.

    Link please? Kinda feel like I shouldn't have had to ask for that based on how you chose to begin your comment but here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -25 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So the "biologists and pharmacologists" you are citing are just armchair scientists in the Lemmy comment section

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments