you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Im with Kagi on this. Wtf is wrong with someone sending you emails to an email you decided to make public. This person is projecting how fragile their argument is by reacting this way.

Vlad was doing the right thing discussing it in private first before they probably address this stupid attempt at causing drama. I read all of the shit they posted and it sounds to me like they are nitpicking/strawmanning AI features which are very VERY optional.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Wtf is wrong with someone sending you emails to an email you decided to make public

    there's nothing wrong with that. continuously messaging someone after being told more than once that the recipient doesn't want to continue the conversation, though? that's not okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I get that but it's a dick move by the author of that article to publicly speak bad about a product and then don't even wanna listen to what that person who made that product has to say to defend it. Especially if there's some false information that get's spread by that article. I'm not saying anything written in that article is true or false - just explaining the situation from Vlad's view.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    that article

    it's a post on a personal blog of a person on the internet. a blog post. not an article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Blog post or article - whatever. The effect is the same: It's on the internet, people read it and get influenced. Just because I picked the wrong word doesn't kill my point. I'm sure you get what I meant.

  • source
  • parent