▲ 1305 ▼ "prompt engineering" (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe that's intelligence. I don't know. Brains, you know? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's not. It's reflecting it's training material. LLMs and other generative AI approaches lack a model of the world which is obvious on the mistakes they make. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You could say our brain does the same. It just trains in real time and has much better hardware. What are we doing but applying things we've already learnt that are encoded in our neurons. They aren't called neural networks for nothing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You could say that but you'd be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Tabula rasa, piss and cum and saliva soaking into a mattress. It's all training data and fallibility. Put it together and what have you got (bibbidy boppidy boo). You know what I'm saying? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Magical thinking? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Okay, now you're definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don't think I'm an LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's not. It's reflecting it's training material. LLMs and other generative AI approaches lack a model of the world which is obvious on the mistakes they make. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You could say our brain does the same. It just trains in real time and has much better hardware. What are we doing but applying things we've already learnt that are encoded in our neurons. They aren't called neural networks for nothing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You could say that but you'd be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Tabula rasa, piss and cum and saliva soaking into a mattress. It's all training data and fallibility. Put it together and what have you got (bibbidy boppidy boo). You know what I'm saying? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Magical thinking? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Okay, now you're definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don't think I'm an LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You could say our brain does the same. It just trains in real time and has much better hardware. What are we doing but applying things we've already learnt that are encoded in our neurons. They aren't called neural networks for nothing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You could say that but you'd be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago You could say that but you'd be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Tabula rasa, piss and cum and saliva soaking into a mattress. It's all training data and fallibility. Put it together and what have you got (bibbidy boppidy boo). You know what I'm saying? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Magical thinking? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Okay, now you're definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don't think I'm an LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Magical thinking? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Okay, now you're definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don't think I'm an LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Okay, now you're definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don't think I'm an LLM. permalink fedilink source parent