▲ 434 ▼ Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 (jlai.lu) submitted 2 years ago by ElCanut@jlai.lu to c/technology@beehaw.org 148 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) He proved it mathematically, but it was only recently confirmed experimentally permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I see, thanks for the insight! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago No problem! Interpretations of quantum mechanics are also still very much under discussion, and Bell's inequality only says that there are no local hidden variables. While QM very accurately describes observations so far, it's by no means solved, and there's a good chance that a new theory will upend much of it in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I see, thanks for the insight! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago No problem! Interpretations of quantum mechanics are also still very much under discussion, and Bell's inequality only says that there are no local hidden variables. While QM very accurately describes observations so far, it's by no means solved, and there's a good chance that a new theory will upend much of it in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago No problem! Interpretations of quantum mechanics are also still very much under discussion, and Bell's inequality only says that there are no local hidden variables. While QM very accurately describes observations so far, it's by no means solved, and there's a good chance that a new theory will upend much of it in the future permalink fedilink source parent
