you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Can someone provide a summary on what this means? I thought there were malicious exploits in this. Why is it back up and the perpetrator unbanned?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lasse is the original maintainer of XZ, they have been placed back in their position as sole maintainer.

    "Jia Tan" was the person who slipped the backdoor into XZ and is now banned.

    Lasse has already fixed abd removed the backdoor.

    XZ itself is critical software everyone uses (its one of the main compression/decompression programs used on linux)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Yes but damage seems to be done. Distros are talking or have moved off of it to zstd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Zstd and xz fullfil different needs. Xz take more time to compress and is faster to decompress as far as I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    XZ is a slog to compress and decompress but compresses a bit smaller than zstd.

    zstd is quite quick to compress, very quick to decompress, scales to many cores (vanilla xz is single-core only) and scales a lot further in the quicker end of the compression speed <-> file size trade-off spectrum while using the same format.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't downvote people asking questions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)