[–] 10 points 2 hours ago

These terms were originally heavily used as heavy right wing 4chan terms, largely circulating in hate circle jerks (which is like 50% of 4chan anyways). Largely associated with millenial incel culture.

Gen Z proceeded to take these terms and parody the fuck out if them, effectively mocking incel culture and turning it into a huge joke. Thus then became mainstream and its largely acted as a very successful humiliation tactic towards the hateful groups.

Think stuff like all the "chad" memes but applying it to silly stuff, like intense cuts of a random chair or a porta-potty, x-pilled terms, etc.

All their terms have been mocked into oblivion, you cant really use the terms without just sounding like a gen z meme now.

An example of when millennials did a similiar thing was mocking the shit out of gen x biker/trucker hyper masculine culture and turning it into an ironic joke. IE the skeleton "my body is a machine that turns x into y" jokes, or ironic memes of edgy skeletons/wolves/etc. Three moons shirt, those things.

10/10, I fucking love how culture can do stuff like this over time lol

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Incredibly dumb approach.

    You should ban using AI for the purpose of legal disputes, medicine, etc, profesionally.

    Its not about the output, its about what you use it for.

    I am also 100% okay with legally requiring a clearly visible disclaimer that AI shouldnt be used for x/y/z and its output should alwats be fact checked or whatever.

    But trying to outright ban specific types of output is pointless and trivial to circumvent.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Its incredibly trivial to just host up your own instance if gogs or gitea on a cheap computer, throw woodpecker on it if you want easy CI/CD

    It doesnt take much hardware at all for a git server, a raspberry pi will handle it just fine.

    Or just a cheap box liquidated from some office, just go buy some box from a used pc seller in your city, they'll have some.

    Toss a 1TB drive in it.

    Throw debian on it.

    Install Gogs + Woodpecker

    And then set em up and connect the two together.

    Grats, you have your own self hosted git server whee

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    I have a similiar setup, but streamlined way more.

    1. I just use docker on my Linux dev box to create disposable containers that my agents can do work sandbox'd inside of. But, Id like to eventually try out Amazon's firecracker instead as a way to create thin linux VMs on the server machine.

    2. I use Github Copilot as my AI distribution subscription, as this has first class integration with VS Code and allows me to easily rollback code changes, and click to preview inside of vscode natively.

    3. I lock down all commands my agents can run behind MCP, instead of "can do anything" access to the terminal, my agents have an explicit set of MCP tools that wrap terminal commands, with params. This dramatically improves keeping the agent on the rails and avoids common issues like it getting very grep hungry and prepping files constantly (I return a 1 line warning anytime the agent invokes the grep tool on a file less than 200 lines in length, instead of results)

    This simplifies a lot, I can manage a preset set of plugins and etc installed on the vscode instance via a dockerfile + docker conpose, letting me define a bespoke set of installed tools for a given project.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    In my country, a bit more than half are.

    However the point Im making is if I asked a random collection of young men here to identify which is which, most of them would get most of the answers wrong, and theyd argue over it.

    Because theres basically zero education on the topic. Not exactly there fault per-se, Im moreso calling out the government for failing our youth on this.

    Ill also note that most young women would also probably get a lot of the answers wrong too...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Blaming AI for this, instead of the shitty people who made the decisions, is still very dumb.

    I agree that aforementioned companies/managers/etc are shitty.

    Thats not AIs fault lol, and isn't a reflection of it.

    Blaming AI as tge issue is just kneejerk mob mentality.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -11 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    People truly are just exceptionally out of touch.

    These convos constantly have people pulling out the tired old remarks.

    1. Quoting 1 shitty study from years ago that is both heavily outdated and doesn't support their argument the way they think it does, and their renarks indicate they didnt actually read the study

    2. "But its theft" which is more of an ethical Grey discussion that Ill leave it up to courts to decide, and so far courts have not ruled AI usage for coding as illegal. Which means I do not give a shit. The entire concept is such obtuse ethical showboating. Only people grasping at straws try and pull this one out.

    3. "But what about water usage" bitch we are software devs, data centers using water has been an issue for centuries do not pretend this is magically a new issue. If you have been deploying basically anything in the cloud, especially AWS, then picking AI as special makes you look like an incredibly uninformed idiot. Did you seriously think deploying entire docker containers constantly with integration tested pipelines on every PR wasnt also using water...?

    4. "Its output is bad" skill issue. Literally skill issue. As in, "go learn how to use skill files". In 2026 if your llm is still producing bad output thats 100% user error. Get good.

    5. "But what about AIs deleting prod databases" yeah thats an even bigger user error. Why the hell did the LLM have access to be able to do that? Learn to properly use MCP tools and hiw to properly control what commands and operations you grant an LLM access to. Its not even that hard but people are just so lazy.

    Every single goddamn thread people crawl out of the woodwork and hammer on repeating these same things. Its all they have.

    If you actually wanna have a serious discussion maybe bring up more interesting dilemmas like Clean Room problems...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    So, my fiance and I have for quite awhile come to terms with us being poly, primarily myself but she is cool with it.

    Thing is, we've been together for 13 years now, are getting married soon, and while we have agreed that if we ever met someone we clicked with, we also have come to terms with the fact it feels like that won't actually ever happen.

    We're both very introverted and keep to ourselves. We aren't actually party goers, and the wildest nights we have are the extremely rare night where we host a board game night with like, maybe 4 friends. And that's a "rager" for us, comparatively.

    We've looked into some dating apps but the results are... abysmal. Non starter really.

    And since we are both so far along in our life together, it feels more and more like it would be impossible to "Fairly" include another person anyways. They'd forever be "second" in that me and my fiance have thirteen (and counting) years of history, whereas the new person would be starting completely fresh. That doesn't seem like it could ever work anyways, no matter how hard we tried right?

    We've talked at length about this and agreed that it just doesn't seem like it could even work, despite us wanting it to, and that we're sorta just gonna have to be cool with being monogamous poly, which is weird but I dunno how else to describe it.

    The only situation I've considered that would work is if it was another couple that both of us click with both of them, and everyone vibes with each other in every direction, which then means at least everyone has someone else they have history with, and someone else that is new, which feels more like now everyone is on "equal" footing if you will, removing that feeling of imbalance.

    But then of course we have to confront the fact that the odds of two people finding two other people and everyone vibing with everyone else is... well incredibly low. And when I say vibing I'm talking "we want to have a close committed intimate and romantic relationship" level.

    So, I guess I wanted to send out some feelers on if any other folks are in this sort of state, how are you navigating it, how do you feel about it, lets talk about this sort of state.

    Something to noodle on:

    Is it morally wrong to try and initiate a poly relationship with a third person, when the other 2 people have a "fallback" of each other, such that the third person forever will be subjected to the 2v1 power imbalance, that if things broke down the 2 would quick the third out, forever putting them at a disadvantage?

    Cuz, personally, I feel like I can't morally subject someone to that myself, I'd forever feel "off" about putting another person (no matter how willing) into that position, it feels... wrong.

     

    Im looking for some form of self hosted application, ideally dockerized(able), that can connect to and manage an existing database (Im not picky on the DB type, Postgres prolly best though).

    However Id like if it manages it via a nice well designed ERD. The closest I have found so far is PgAdmin but unfortunately it's ERD leaves a lot to be desired. It's kinda clunky, and it cant "diff" against your existing database to produce a migration script, all it can do is produce a script that expects you to totally drop the existing DB and re-apply the schema from scratch.

    Something like Luna/Moon would be cool, but every example I look up seems to be an application you install locally on your machine and interact with directly, as opposed to a web interface.

    If you know of such a tool let me know!

     

    I just downloaded the app, its loading posts just fine from lemmy.world, but where on earth do I login?

    Clicking on Profile and Submit just tell me they wont work unless I am logged in. Ideally these two CTAs should instead redirect to login if you are not logged in.

    I am looking all over this interface and I am either totally blind or completely unable to find the login option, is it buried somewhere or am I crazy?

    Edit: Nevermind found it, top of the burger menu, I think maybe the UX of that button could be made a bit more visual, it at first glance with the icon looked like just a title.

    Perhaps add a big green + symbol on it so it pops more for adding your account? The dull blue and lemmy icon aren't what I normally would associate typically with a login button, so it totally didn't pop out at me. Legit took me a solid 5+ minutes to notice it D:

     

    Right now there seems to be a bit of an issue where if I want to share a link to a lemmy post with a friend, but if we call different servers our "home", even though both of our "homes" have a roughly similar copy of the same post, there currently is no easy way that I perceive for us to navigate to "our" copy of that post.

    This becomes further of an issue when it comes to search engine parsing. For example I use lemmy.world as my "home" server, however when I find information on google it may link to the fedia.io or whatever "sources" link.

    For reading this is no big deal.

    But if I want to respond to the post, I now need to somehow figure out a way to re-route to the lemmy.world copy of that post to make my submission with my user account.

    I think ideally what we need to consider is perhaps one of the following:

    A: a browser plugin that can automatically detect and redirect to the matching version of the post for your server

    B: OAuth support, so I can OAuth login to any lemmy server with my credentials from my "home" server via an OAuth v2 token

    view more: next ›