ABCnews

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

but the biden/obama/clinton/pelosi/schiff family wealth needs no investigation?

it's not just debts. it's any money.

maybe i'm naive, but i don't believe you could buy cornel west. i would doubt mysef if he wins the green nomination, drops out, and backs biden. i don't know anything else that might shake my faith is his character.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I never said family wealth needs no investigation, I said massive debt which is mysteriously paid off needs investigation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    meh. i don't think it's worth the energy of even saying "there ought to be an investigation" of any of them, myself. i'm saying that you're looking at the wrong person to start hunting out corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's not about Doctor West, it's about ANYONE in massive debt seeking public office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    i think we should start with anyone in public office, pretty much endlessly. let's root out corruption where it has actually taken place, not where it MIGHT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Oh, definitely, the problem with that, as we're seeing with the Supreme Court, it's the people in power who are deciding the rules.

    Now we could make a change with some form of anti-corruption constitutional amendment, but that requires a 2/3rds majority in the Senate and we can't even get 60 votes to break a filibuster much less the 67 needed for an amendment.

  • source
  • parent