ABCnews

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago

Oh, definitely, the problem with that, as we're seeing with the Supreme Court, it's the people in power who are deciding the rules.

Now we could make a change with some form of anti-corruption constitutional amendment, but that requires a 2/3rds majority in the Senate and we can't even get 60 votes to break a filibuster much less the 67 needed for an amendment.

  • source
  • parent