Me and my friend were discussing this the other day about how he said RAID is no longer needed. He said it was due to how big SSDs have gotten and that apparently you can replace sectors within them if a problem occurs which is why having an array is not needed.

I replied with the fact that arrays allow for redundancy that create a faster uptime if there are issues and drive needs to be replaced. And depending on what you are doing, that is more valuable than just doing the new thing. Especially because RAID allows redundancy that can replicate lost data if needed depending on the configuration.

What do you all think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • Bit rot is still a problem, you need a high integrity file system and or RAID to avoid that
  • Full drive failure is still about as likely, IE the main reason for RAID of multiple drives in the first place.

A good read on the problems with SSDs SSD 101: How Reliable are SSDs?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments