▲ 97 ▼ What’s the worst car you’ve ever driven? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by zachimusprime44@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ianovic69@feddit.uk 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commandar@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) The transmission in those things is an amazing level of suck, too. It's this bizarre automatic manual thing that's just awful to drive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Porsche measures their automatic gear changes in milliseconds. Smart measures them in geologic time scales. I truly don't understand why they didn't put a CVT in those 2nd generation cars (the ones sold in North America). It's the perfect application! Small car, not a lot of power, efficiency minded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago If the smart car was made today it probably would have a cvt. But an extremely budget car back then, cvts weren't as common. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They're not so bad if you drive one often enough. I had one for five-six years and drove it only in tiptronic, shifting while lifting off the gas. In automatic mode yeah it's dog. This was the gas version that needed premium fuel. I drove it daily on the 401 for awhile. Was the first car I had that absolutely required winter tires, was undrivable in snow/ice without. I thought it was a decent enough car, got it barely used very cheap due to it's wild depreciation which was a good thing, until it started needing serious work that made no sense to do. At the end it was worth as much as a new set of tires for it, as in nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commandar@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) The transmission in those things is an amazing level of suck, too. It's this bizarre automatic manual thing that's just awful to drive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Porsche measures their automatic gear changes in milliseconds. Smart measures them in geologic time scales. I truly don't understand why they didn't put a CVT in those 2nd generation cars (the ones sold in North America). It's the perfect application! Small car, not a lot of power, efficiency minded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago If the smart car was made today it probably would have a cvt. But an extremely budget car back then, cvts weren't as common. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They're not so bad if you drive one often enough. I had one for five-six years and drove it only in tiptronic, shifting while lifting off the gas. In automatic mode yeah it's dog. This was the gas version that needed premium fuel. I drove it daily on the 401 for awhile. Was the first car I had that absolutely required winter tires, was undrivable in snow/ice without. I thought it was a decent enough car, got it barely used very cheap due to it's wild depreciation which was a good thing, until it started needing serious work that made no sense to do. At the end it was worth as much as a new set of tires for it, as in nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Porsche measures their automatic gear changes in milliseconds. Smart measures them in geologic time scales. I truly don't understand why they didn't put a CVT in those 2nd generation cars (the ones sold in North America). It's the perfect application! Small car, not a lot of power, efficiency minded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago If the smart car was made today it probably would have a cvt. But an extremely budget car back then, cvts weren't as common. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago If the smart car was made today it probably would have a cvt. But an extremely budget car back then, cvts weren't as common. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They're not so bad if you drive one often enough. I had one for five-six years and drove it only in tiptronic, shifting while lifting off the gas. In automatic mode yeah it's dog. This was the gas version that needed premium fuel. I drove it daily on the 401 for awhile. Was the first car I had that absolutely required winter tires, was undrivable in snow/ice without. I thought it was a decent enough car, got it barely used very cheap due to it's wild depreciation which was a good thing, until it started needing serious work that made no sense to do. At the end it was worth as much as a new set of tires for it, as in nothing. permalink fedilink source parent