▲ 1083 ▼ Murdered by numbers. (feddit.uk) submitted 3 years ago by SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk [M] to c/murderedbywords@feddit.uk 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] kadu@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) that's what I meant. You wouldn't give them to whoever not needed them. I called them man, you called them people without uterus. In other words, you don't want to treat all equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) there’s no equivalence here. So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don't say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus? But would you? If you do not, wouldn't that make you treat people unequally, in some sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) that's what I meant. You wouldn't give them to whoever not needed them. I called them man, you called them people without uterus. In other words, you don't want to treat all equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) there’s no equivalence here. So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don't say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus? But would you? If you do not, wouldn't that make you treat people unequally, in some sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] kadu@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) there’s no equivalence here. So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don't say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus? But would you? If you do not, wouldn't that make you treat people unequally, in some sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) there’s no equivalence here. So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don't say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus? But would you? If you do not, wouldn't that make you treat people unequally, in some sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent