▲ 395 ▼ Have you ever been to a movie so terrible that you saw people leaving the theater? Which one was it? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Trae@lemmy.world to c/movies@lemmy.world 573 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago (6 children) Yes! Battlefield Earth. I stayed for the whole movie because I couldn’t believe how bad it was. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 69 points 2 years ago (5 children) To me battlefield earth falls under the "so bad it begins to loop back around into Cheesey fun" category. I especially love how what are essentially cave men find F16 fighter jets from the past and not only do the jets and old fuel work, but the cave men know how to start them and fly them effectively. L Ron really outdid himself on that gem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago really outdid himself You should see what he saved for the non-fiction section. permalink fedilink source parent [–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not even F16s, Harriers. Notoriously hard to fly and constantly breaking down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 2 years ago That's right, Jesus. I haven't watched that movie in like 20 years so I just took a shot in the dark at what jets were really popular at the time and we were flying the shit out of F16s during the Gulf War. Harriers were fucking nightmares for the mechanics and avionics techs that worked them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago It really was something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Didn't the humans use the "learning machine" to teach themselves advanced knowledge? The same machine the alien overlords put Jonnie in to teach him their language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 2 years ago Sounds like you actually know. It's been over 2 decades since I saw that movie, but I'm sure they handwaved it with something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Ok but the book is actually really good though. It's hilarious that they never explain how they learned how to fly and operate the machinery permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The book is fucking terrible but it's great pulp scifi. It's obvious that by the time he wrote it nobody dared edit him, so there's multiple parts of the book that repeat but worded slightly differently, and in general the plot etc just aren't great and the whole thing is thinly veiled Scientology propaganda ("Psychlo catrists" – psychiatrists, ie. 'ol Ron's worst enemy). But if you take it for the pulpy weird mess it is, it's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago That's what happened for me, I read the book as a teenager and didn't know anything about Ron or scientology so when I read it, all I saw was a piece of scifi permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago I don't know that I'd call it really good, but it made more sense. At least until they nuke the alien home world and the whole thing blows up because it's hollow and filled with explosive gas for some reason. Still, you can always tell illiterate motherfuckers when they trash talk a novelist, even a pulp novelist, based on a movie adaptation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] teft@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) That movie suffers from the source material being fucking ridiculously long and weird. Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 is like 1000 pages or so. Also it's L Ron Hubbard so the book is just weird and creepy at times. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) They used to get paid by the word back then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHlWwHr6DXk&t=0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For a writer he was not concise in his explanations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mrgreyeyes@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago I watched the trailer and it looked so good. I was really waiting for it for a half year or so. You can imagine my disappointment. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 2 points 2 years ago mAn aNiMaL!!1 permalink fedilink source parent [–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago one of the people walking out was me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I've watched that movie at least four times since it's on the RiffTrax twitch channel rotation. Even with some great riffs, it's such a slog, but at least we got a running "blow the dome!" joke out of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 69 points 2 years ago (5 children) To me battlefield earth falls under the "so bad it begins to loop back around into Cheesey fun" category. I especially love how what are essentially cave men find F16 fighter jets from the past and not only do the jets and old fuel work, but the cave men know how to start them and fly them effectively. L Ron really outdid himself on that gem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago really outdid himself You should see what he saved for the non-fiction section. permalink fedilink source parent [–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not even F16s, Harriers. Notoriously hard to fly and constantly breaking down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 2 years ago That's right, Jesus. I haven't watched that movie in like 20 years so I just took a shot in the dark at what jets were really popular at the time and we were flying the shit out of F16s during the Gulf War. Harriers were fucking nightmares for the mechanics and avionics techs that worked them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago It really was something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Didn't the humans use the "learning machine" to teach themselves advanced knowledge? The same machine the alien overlords put Jonnie in to teach him their language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 2 years ago Sounds like you actually know. It's been over 2 decades since I saw that movie, but I'm sure they handwaved it with something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Ok but the book is actually really good though. It's hilarious that they never explain how they learned how to fly and operate the machinery permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The book is fucking terrible but it's great pulp scifi. It's obvious that by the time he wrote it nobody dared edit him, so there's multiple parts of the book that repeat but worded slightly differently, and in general the plot etc just aren't great and the whole thing is thinly veiled Scientology propaganda ("Psychlo catrists" – psychiatrists, ie. 'ol Ron's worst enemy). But if you take it for the pulpy weird mess it is, it's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago That's what happened for me, I read the book as a teenager and didn't know anything about Ron or scientology so when I read it, all I saw was a piece of scifi permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago I don't know that I'd call it really good, but it made more sense. At least until they nuke the alien home world and the whole thing blows up because it's hollow and filled with explosive gas for some reason. Still, you can always tell illiterate motherfuckers when they trash talk a novelist, even a pulp novelist, based on a movie adaptation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago really outdid himself You should see what he saved for the non-fiction section. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not even F16s, Harriers. Notoriously hard to fly and constantly breaking down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 2 years ago That's right, Jesus. I haven't watched that movie in like 20 years so I just took a shot in the dark at what jets were really popular at the time and we were flying the shit out of F16s during the Gulf War. Harriers were fucking nightmares for the mechanics and avionics techs that worked them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 2 years ago That's right, Jesus. I haven't watched that movie in like 20 years so I just took a shot in the dark at what jets were really popular at the time and we were flying the shit out of F16s during the Gulf War. Harriers were fucking nightmares for the mechanics and avionics techs that worked them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago It really was something. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Didn't the humans use the "learning machine" to teach themselves advanced knowledge? The same machine the alien overlords put Jonnie in to teach him their language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 2 years ago Sounds like you actually know. It's been over 2 decades since I saw that movie, but I'm sure they handwaved it with something like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trae@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 2 years ago Sounds like you actually know. It's been over 2 decades since I saw that movie, but I'm sure they handwaved it with something like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Ok but the book is actually really good though. It's hilarious that they never explain how they learned how to fly and operate the machinery permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The book is fucking terrible but it's great pulp scifi. It's obvious that by the time he wrote it nobody dared edit him, so there's multiple parts of the book that repeat but worded slightly differently, and in general the plot etc just aren't great and the whole thing is thinly veiled Scientology propaganda ("Psychlo catrists" – psychiatrists, ie. 'ol Ron's worst enemy). But if you take it for the pulpy weird mess it is, it's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago That's what happened for me, I read the book as a teenager and didn't know anything about Ron or scientology so when I read it, all I saw was a piece of scifi permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago I don't know that I'd call it really good, but it made more sense. At least until they nuke the alien home world and the whole thing blows up because it's hollow and filled with explosive gas for some reason. Still, you can always tell illiterate motherfuckers when they trash talk a novelist, even a pulp novelist, based on a movie adaptation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The book is fucking terrible but it's great pulp scifi. It's obvious that by the time he wrote it nobody dared edit him, so there's multiple parts of the book that repeat but worded slightly differently, and in general the plot etc just aren't great and the whole thing is thinly veiled Scientology propaganda ("Psychlo catrists" – psychiatrists, ie. 'ol Ron's worst enemy). But if you take it for the pulpy weird mess it is, it's fun. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago That's what happened for me, I read the book as a teenager and didn't know anything about Ron or scientology so when I read it, all I saw was a piece of scifi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago That's what happened for me, I read the book as a teenager and didn't know anything about Ron or scientology so when I read it, all I saw was a piece of scifi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago I don't know that I'd call it really good, but it made more sense. At least until they nuke the alien home world and the whole thing blows up because it's hollow and filled with explosive gas for some reason. Still, you can always tell illiterate motherfuckers when they trash talk a novelist, even a pulp novelist, based on a movie adaptation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) That movie suffers from the source material being fucking ridiculously long and weird. Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 is like 1000 pages or so. Also it's L Ron Hubbard so the book is just weird and creepy at times. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) They used to get paid by the word back then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHlWwHr6DXk&t=0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For a writer he was not concise in his explanations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) They used to get paid by the word back then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHlWwHr6DXk&t=0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For a writer he was not concise in his explanations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For a writer he was not concise in his explanations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrgreyeyes@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago I watched the trailer and it looked so good. I was really waiting for it for a half year or so. You can imagine my disappointment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago one of the people walking out was me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I've watched that movie at least four times since it's on the RiffTrax twitch channel rotation. Even with some great riffs, it's such a slog, but at least we got a running "blow the dome!" joke out of it. permalink fedilink source parent