▲ 230 ▼ Users ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consent (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by alyaza@beehaw.org [M] to c/technology@beehaw.org 45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m looking at it from a perspective of intentionality. Careless? Definitely. A risk ? For sure. But the situation is still not as the title implies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It could be hacked, or law enforcement could subpoena the data. Neither are even improbable events nowadays. Sure, the headline doesn’t quite communicate every possibility or the complete spectrum of dangers, but that’s not the job of a headline. The job of a headline is to get you to click the link. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com 1 point 2 years ago Risks that are already described. The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It could be hacked, or law enforcement could subpoena the data. Neither are even improbable events nowadays. Sure, the headline doesn’t quite communicate every possibility or the complete spectrum of dangers, but that’s not the job of a headline. The job of a headline is to get you to click the link. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com 1 point 2 years ago Risks that are already described. The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com 1 point 2 years ago Risks that are already described. The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public. permalink fedilink source parent