▲ 375 ▼ Murder defendant slips restraints in court, stabs his lawyer with pen. All good, attorney says (www.latimes.com) submitted 2 years ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude broke through restraints, clearly a pen is a deadly weapon in his hands. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 4 points 2 years ago (5 children) I guess. But you can also smother someone with a fluffy pillow. So that's a deadly weapon, too? Like where is the line between "deadly weapon" and "any random object". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] quindraco@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago There is no such line. The pillow counts as a weapon and all weapons count as deadly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] candybrie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago I think it might just be a line of how they used the random object could have reasonably resulted in death. So if you smack someone in the face with a fluffy pillow, it's not a deadly weapon. If you try to smother them with it, it is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'll be honest, if I roll 99 on a crit roll with a pillow I damn well expect an instant kill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why are you using a d100 for attack rolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago It's a homebrew weapon from their last campaign in Pathfinder that they ported over, but the stats are legit and it's balanced trust them permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Seems quite simple to me. Things like guns, swords, daggers and the like are designed to be weapons. So they're generally going to be assumed to be a weapon any time they're used/brandished. But literally anything can be used as a weapon. So, in normal use they're not a weapon but if used as a weapon, they become one in that instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Yeah, but then the term "deadly weapon" is kind of meaningless as it basically just means "assualt with a thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I think on a legal level it means it was an object that was being wielded as a weapon, and from the attack in the specific instance it was meant to kill and the object was capable of achieving that. Hence a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 years ago Yeah, I'd agree there. It should be whatever the US equivalent of aggravated assault is. But the charges you could levy bearing in mind he aimed for the head could go as far as attempted murder I guess. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago Not entirely useless. "Assaulted with thing that could kill or maim under the circumstances at that time" is pretty relevant, even if it is super broad. Spitting on someone Is assault. If I was on trial for spitting on someone I'd hate to get lumped together with the guy who caved someone's head in with a lead pipe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If you used it as a weapon and it had the potential to kill the victim, then yes, it would be a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 4 points 2 years ago (5 children) I guess. But you can also smother someone with a fluffy pillow. So that's a deadly weapon, too? Like where is the line between "deadly weapon" and "any random object". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] quindraco@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago There is no such line. The pillow counts as a weapon and all weapons count as deadly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] candybrie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago I think it might just be a line of how they used the random object could have reasonably resulted in death. So if you smack someone in the face with a fluffy pillow, it's not a deadly weapon. If you try to smother them with it, it is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'll be honest, if I roll 99 on a crit roll with a pillow I damn well expect an instant kill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why are you using a d100 for attack rolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago It's a homebrew weapon from their last campaign in Pathfinder that they ported over, but the stats are legit and it's balanced trust them permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Seems quite simple to me. Things like guns, swords, daggers and the like are designed to be weapons. So they're generally going to be assumed to be a weapon any time they're used/brandished. But literally anything can be used as a weapon. So, in normal use they're not a weapon but if used as a weapon, they become one in that instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Yeah, but then the term "deadly weapon" is kind of meaningless as it basically just means "assualt with a thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I think on a legal level it means it was an object that was being wielded as a weapon, and from the attack in the specific instance it was meant to kill and the object was capable of achieving that. Hence a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 years ago Yeah, I'd agree there. It should be whatever the US equivalent of aggravated assault is. But the charges you could levy bearing in mind he aimed for the head could go as far as attempted murder I guess. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago Not entirely useless. "Assaulted with thing that could kill or maim under the circumstances at that time" is pretty relevant, even if it is super broad. Spitting on someone Is assault. If I was on trial for spitting on someone I'd hate to get lumped together with the guy who caved someone's head in with a lead pipe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If you used it as a weapon and it had the potential to kill the victim, then yes, it would be a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago There is no such line. The pillow counts as a weapon and all weapons count as deadly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago I think it might just be a line of how they used the random object could have reasonably resulted in death. So if you smack someone in the face with a fluffy pillow, it's not a deadly weapon. If you try to smother them with it, it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'll be honest, if I roll 99 on a crit roll with a pillow I damn well expect an instant kill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why are you using a d100 for attack rolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago It's a homebrew weapon from their last campaign in Pathfinder that they ported over, but the stats are legit and it's balanced trust them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why are you using a d100 for attack rolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago It's a homebrew weapon from their last campaign in Pathfinder that they ported over, but the stats are legit and it's balanced trust them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago It's a homebrew weapon from their last campaign in Pathfinder that they ported over, but the stats are legit and it's balanced trust them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Seems quite simple to me. Things like guns, swords, daggers and the like are designed to be weapons. So they're generally going to be assumed to be a weapon any time they're used/brandished. But literally anything can be used as a weapon. So, in normal use they're not a weapon but if used as a weapon, they become one in that instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Yeah, but then the term "deadly weapon" is kind of meaningless as it basically just means "assualt with a thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I think on a legal level it means it was an object that was being wielded as a weapon, and from the attack in the specific instance it was meant to kill and the object was capable of achieving that. Hence a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 years ago Yeah, I'd agree there. It should be whatever the US equivalent of aggravated assault is. But the charges you could levy bearing in mind he aimed for the head could go as far as attempted murder I guess. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago Not entirely useless. "Assaulted with thing that could kill or maim under the circumstances at that time" is pretty relevant, even if it is super broad. Spitting on someone Is assault. If I was on trial for spitting on someone I'd hate to get lumped together with the guy who caved someone's head in with a lead pipe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Yeah, but then the term "deadly weapon" is kind of meaningless as it basically just means "assualt with a thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I think on a legal level it means it was an object that was being wielded as a weapon, and from the attack in the specific instance it was meant to kill and the object was capable of achieving that. Hence a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 years ago Yeah, I'd agree there. It should be whatever the US equivalent of aggravated assault is. But the charges you could levy bearing in mind he aimed for the head could go as far as attempted murder I guess. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago Not entirely useless. "Assaulted with thing that could kill or maim under the circumstances at that time" is pretty relevant, even if it is super broad. Spitting on someone Is assault. If I was on trial for spitting on someone I'd hate to get lumped together with the guy who caved someone's head in with a lead pipe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I think on a legal level it means it was an object that was being wielded as a weapon, and from the attack in the specific instance it was meant to kill and the object was capable of achieving that. Hence a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 years ago Yeah, I'd agree there. It should be whatever the US equivalent of aggravated assault is. But the charges you could levy bearing in mind he aimed for the head could go as far as attempted murder I guess. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago Not entirely useless. "Assaulted with thing that could kill or maim under the circumstances at that time" is pretty relevant, even if it is super broad. Spitting on someone Is assault. If I was on trial for spitting on someone I'd hate to get lumped together with the guy who caved someone's head in with a lead pipe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* If you used it as a weapon and it had the potential to kill the victim, then yes, it would be a deadly weapon. permalink fedilink source parent