you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 68 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I've heard blur is not destructive. Please use a paintbrush on 100% opacity if you do this

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Depends on the kind of blur. Some kinds can indeed be almost perfectly removed if you know the used blurring function, others are destructive. But, yes, don't take that chance. Always delete/paint over sensitive information.

    Source: we had to do just that in a course I took a long time ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I prefer sampling the surroundings, typing out a different number or text over it, then blurring with a non destructive effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Ah man, I remember when they caught some pedo creep who used a non-destructive blur on the CSAM materials he produced that included his face. So satisfying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've switched to a mosaic blur. Looks neat and always destructive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Actually not always, there is a script that can recover text from mosaic'd screenshots if the font and pixellation technique is known. I just use a fake mosaic – the easiest way is to paste a bitmap of non-confidential text from elsewhere in the screenshot and then apply the filter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments